Crippled mount; was Re: Good-bye Pentax (2)

2003-03-19 Thread ernreed2
Roland posted, among many other good things: But the *ist D will have full compatibility with the older lenses. So, there's still no signs that Pentax are about to abandon support for aperture ring. You can't judge Pentax future mid and market bodies by the entry-level body. What bothers

Re: Crippled mount; was Re: Good-bye Pentax (2)

2003-03-19 Thread Roland Mabo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 09:35:31 US/Central What bothers me, (I am not Boz, and I am not switching to Canon anytime soon) is that the film *ist is now the FOURTH entry-level body they've introduced with this mount. But it's still entry level. Pentax has not made a mid or

Re: Crippled mount; was Re: Good-bye Pentax (2)

2003-03-19 Thread Doug Franklin
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 09:35:31 US/Central, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What bothers me, (I am not Boz, and I am not switching to Canon anytime soon) is that the film *ist is now the FOURTH entry-level body they've introduced with this mount. I have a suspicion that there's a translation problem

Re: Crippled mount; was Re: Good-bye Pentax (2)

2003-03-19 Thread Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Crippled mount; was Re: Good-bye Pentax (2) On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 09:35:31 US/Central, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What bothers me, (I am not Boz, and I am not switching to Canon anytime soon) is that the film *ist is now the FOURTH entry-level body they've introduced