Damn, I wish I'd said that.
John Francis wrote:
Well, he has the advantage of not actually having to bother
with using the camera before he reviews it.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:40:29PM -0500, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Good to see that Ken Rockwell has is review up.
On 11/6/06, Cotty
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Bruce Dayton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
It's really been designed for people who want to say they have a
Nikon, but don't really want to take any pictures. So anything that
can be removed, has been - lowers the
Why not?
D70/D80 use electronic shutter (sensor) to achieve those speeds AFAIR...
2006/11/7, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Bruce Dayton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
It's really been designed for
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Thibouille wrote:
Why not?
D70/D80 use electronic shutter (sensor) to achieve those speeds AFAIR...
Is that different to the technology employed by Pentax?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Thibouille wrote:
Why not?
D70/D80 use electronic shutter (sensor) to achieve those speeds AFAIR...
Is that different to the technology employed by Pentax?
Kostas
Yes, it's a hybrid shutter, the actual physical shutter never exceeds
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
Yes, it's a hybrid shutter
[explanation deleted]
Thanks Adam.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I guess there's money to be made in feeding the rumor mill.
Godfrey
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
He has made some comments before indicating that he is tired of being
the good guy when everyone else is leaking.
DagT
Den 6. nov. 2006 kl. 20.00 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
I guess there's money to be made in feeding the rumor mill.
Godfrey
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
Looks like they took out the AF screw drive for older lenses. Makes the
removal of the aperture simulator seem outright user friendly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good to see that Ken Rockwell has is review up.
On 11/6/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
He got screwed quite badly by Canon on the 400D/XTi launch, despite
being one of the few sites that had actually abided the embargo
(DPReview's only ever leaked a couple of times, and always due to a
mistake or technical glitch).
-Adam
DagT wrote:
He has made some comments before indicating
Gonz wrote:
Looks like they took out the AF screw drive for older lenses. Makes the
removal of the aperture simulator seem outright user friendly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
The target market isn't going to care.
--
Other than the larger LCD and ISO3200, it looks like a significant
downgrade from the D50 all around, and it no longer shares batteries
with Nikon's other non-Pro bodies (While the D80 and D200 don't take the
older EN-EL3[a] batteries, the older bodies do take the newer EN-EL3e
batteries). And
Matt Kelch wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Looks like they took out the AF screw drive for older lenses. Makes the
removal of the aperture simulator seem outright user friendly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0611/06110601nikond40.asp
The target market isn't going to
Well, he has the advantage of not actually having to bother
with using the camera before he reviews it.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:40:29PM -0500, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Good to see that Ken Rockwell has is review up.
On 11/6/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really been designed for people who want to say they have a
Nikon, but don't really want to take any pictures. So anything that
can be removed, has been - lowers the cost. grin
--
Bruce
Monday, November 6, 2006, 11:56:55 AM, you wrote:
G Looks like they took out the AF screw drive for
.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Francis
Sent: 06 November 2006 21:24
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: DPReview taking a new stance?
Well, he has the advantage of not actually having to bother
18 matches
Mail list logo