> Difficulty in getting convenient processing is one reason. Many years
> ago, when my Rolleiflex TLR was the only camera I had, I could drop film
> off at a drug store or whatever and get back machine prints of snaps and
> travel photos. Can't do that today. Maybe there are some 1-hour places
> o
Mike Ignatiev wrote:
>...i got myself a rolleicord tlr for well under $200...for sheer
> image quality per buck it's hard to beat. for non-professional use i find it
> difficult to understand why people are paying kilo$ for high end 35mm slr
> systems.
Difficulty in getting convenient processin
> ...although there's one cool thing i'd love to have in digital: uploading
> pics on my home server via cellular uplink. if someone come up with this
> setup, i may reconsider.
This will happen too. Hopefully soon :)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to htt
actually, i was amazed at how good a reasonably priced MF rig can be. now,
besides a p6x7, i got myself a rolleicord tlr for well under $200, as a
rugged inexpensive travel camera giving me kick-ass pictures. for sheer
image quality per buck it's hard to beat. for non-professional use i find it
di
Subject: Re: Medium Format
Date: 6 Apr 2002 18:11:32 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Monaghan)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm
thanks for kudos, y'all ;-)
see http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/budget.html for budget buy ideas,
mf/value.html on best buys etc
at the pro end, an article by Ke
5 matches
Mail list logo
