2010/5/5 David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com:
That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works. It's
not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your
pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape.
You see a moving form, but not a distinct
On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed an
aversion to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints about
pedestrians being hit by cars on base. Hell - they are all wearing camo!
From: Miserere
On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have
developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the
number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on
base. Hell - they are all
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Miserere
On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have
developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the
number of complaints about pedestrians being hit by cars on
base.
2010/5/4 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com:
Seriously, the colors of camo have been developed over years to be
as difficult as possible for human to pick up in a wide variety of
conditions. Works pretty well: Statistics of motorcycle accidents, for
example, show riders wearing camo/khaki
That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works. It's
not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your
pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape.
You see a moving form, but not a distinct outline. It's similar to
how the stripes on a zebra
David Parsons wrote:
That's not really surprising if you understand how camo works. It's
not really designed to hide you, it's designed to break up your
pattern while you are moving so it's harder to determine your shape.
You see a moving form, but not a distinct outline. It's similar to
how
From: Mark Roberts
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Miserere
On 30 April 2010 23:03, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have
developed an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the
number of complaints about pedestrians being
Normally John I would agree. But these incidents (no one was actually hit by
the way, just close calls) occurred because soldiers weren't using crossing
areas, and the road section was poorly lit. As you know the Army recognizes the
need to be visible for traffic safety and requires reflective
On 05/05/2010, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
In a related pet peeve of mine, I intensely dislike drivers of greyish
vehicles who drive in rain or dim light conditions without headlights turned
on. Yes, they can see the road well enough without their lights, but others
can't
Gave me a good chuckle there, Stan. Thanks!
On Apr 30, 2010, at 20:03 , Stan Halpin wrote:
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed
an aversion to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints
about pedestrians being hit by cars on base. Hell - they are
: Exhibit Question - Dress
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white
shirt/black tie/long tails?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I still have a few PDML hats for those that really want to stand out.
Dave
I have a Lehman Brothers hat! They used to be one of our biggest clients,
but we were smart enough to sack them before they crashed. Amazing to think
that my hat is worth more than the bank whose name is on it.
I was planning on a tux (but not tails). But I don't have a matching do-rag.
May have to stick to something more casual.
I do like the Planters Order from the old British Empire but that really should
be reserved to warmer weather.
stan
On Apr 29, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Tom C wrote:
I'm assuming
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Stan Halpin
s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
I was planning on a tux (but not tails). But I don't have a matching do-rag.
May
have to stick to something more casual.
At least where I live, a camouflage do-rag is believed to complement any attire.
--
PDML
Sorry, I have worked for the Army for 39+ years and have developed an aversion
to camo. What triggered it was the number of complaints about pedestrians being
hit by cars on base. Hell - they are all wearing camo! And then they wander
across the street expecting people to see them?
stan
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white
shirt/black tie/long tails?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:28 AM
Subject: Exhibit Question - Dress
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white
shirt/black tie
. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:28 AM
Subject: Exhibit Question - Dress
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may
- Original Message - From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:28 AM
Subject: Exhibit Question - Dress
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white
shirt/black tie/long tails?
We're doing it as a costume party. I'm
Before anyone get ideas; no, I will not dress to match my photo subject.
Thanks
Jostein
2010/4/29 m...@robertstech.com:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be
NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt.
And somebody is dressing in black tie and tails like a penguin.
That's why Cotty wants the video feed.
Wait, you'll see.
Regards, Bob S.;-)
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no white
shirt/black tie/long tails?
We're
At the moment I can only commit to come dressed. Please don't ask for more.
--M.
On 29/04/2010, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt.
And somebody is dressing in black tie and tails like a penguin.
That's why Cotty wants the video feed.
Wait,
I'm sure as long as you're not naked everyone will be happy.
On 4/29/2010 10:32 AM, Miserere wrote:
At the moment I can only commit to come dressed. Please don't ask for more.
--M.
On 29/04/2010, Bob Sullivanrf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
NO, no. Mark Roberts is wearing his kilt.
And
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:58:52 -0400
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing,
if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no
On 4/29/2010 11:05 AM, Subash wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:58:52 -0400
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom Ccaka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing,
if any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be
On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving from the UK and no
On 4/29/2010 12:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be
2010/4/29 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
not me. I'm coming as someone with talent.
Kennyboy?
He said somebody with talent, not with anti-talent.
You obviously DON'T KNOW something the PROS know...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 4/29/2010 5:49 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/4/29 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:
not me. I'm coming as someone with talent.
Kennyboy?
He said somebody with talent, not with anti-talent.
You obviously DON'T KNOW something the PROS know...
Interesting
Larry Colen wrote:
On 4/29/2010 7:23 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that the unofficial dress code for this type of thing, if
any, on the opening day may be casual to dressy casual?
A kilt would be questionable unless arriving
33 matches
Mail list logo
