Howdy, folks,
I'm still in the process of culling and post processing the nearly 1,000
shots I took at the Petit le Mans last weekend. I'm noticing something
that seems strange to me, though, in those shots. As (sort of) implied
in the Stuck Filter thread, I had a polarizer on my 400/5.6 all
On 10/8/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
always. But what I'm seeing in the shots is that all of the ones shot
with the polarizer, and the 400/5.6, are much darker than the ones shot
with the other lenses /sans/ polarizer. So it's got me wondering if the
difference is the polarizer
Mat Maessen wrote:
Is the polarizer a linear or circular polarizer? If it's a linear
polarizer, it's possible that it could be throwing off the metering in
the camera. I just invested in a couple of circular polarizers to
replace the linear polarizers I was using before I got my *istDS2. I
Doug - are they truly darker or are the colors more saturated?
The increased saturation from the polarizer could make them seem darker.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 10/8/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy, folks,
I'm still in the process of culling and post
George Sinos wrote:
Doug - are they truly darker or are the colors more saturated?
The increased saturation from the polarizer could make them seem darker.
They look underexposed by a stop or so compared to the shots around them
done with the other lenses without polarizer. It's almost like
5 matches
Mail list logo
