Mine doesnt, its a pretty short lense, so i cant see why it would. I use it
with a MZ5n.
- Original Message -
From: "RK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: FA* 28-70/2.8 (WAS-Re: FA* Lenses)
&
Nicholas Wright wrote:
> (snip) I have the f4 and am not dissapointed with it (I love how small it
> is), I'd just
> like the extra speed when I need it, but I also have a big penchant for
> Pentax glass(snip)
Right, then you're just the person to answer my question: does the 28~70/4
vig
Alexander Krohe escribió:
> Hi Pål,
> are you sure that this lens (28-70/2.8) is still being
> made like this? I think it is about 10 years ago when
> it was introduced.
AFAIK, it was introduced in 1995.
--
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PRO
>Its really more complicated than that. The lens is a fusion of great built
>quality with some pretty obvious compromises done in order for the power
>zoom and AF to be able to do its job. On many samples the power zoom is
>unable to zoom past the 35mm setting without the help of gravity; that
--- Pål_Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicholas wrote:
>
>
> > I know you've said bad things about this lens
> before, which surprises me
> > since you are such an outspoken Pentax person. :)
> Does the plastic barrel
> > really make that big a difference with this lens?
>
>
> Its real
Nicholas wrote:
> I know you've said bad things about this lens before, which surprises me
> since you are such an outspoken Pentax person. :) Does the plastic barrel
> really make that big a difference with this lens?
Its really more complicated than that. The lens is a fusion of great buil
6 matches
Mail list logo