I mean envy for other similar lenses, because the FA35/2 works so well. And
has a tulip hood. :)
Gerald
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: FA31/1.8 AL Limited Specifications
Gerald Cermak wrote
Well, the 31/1.8 will be competing with Sigma's new 28/1.8 aspherical with
floating elements, at about one-fourth the price. Purchasing the Sigma will
be far easier to justify (or explain after the fact) to our wives.
Paal Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, its an effective way of filling
Gerald Cermak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trust me when I tell you that the current FA35/2 creates no lens envy by
their owners - I have one.
It deserves to inspire envy. The only reason it doesn't, I suppose, is that
it's priced within reach of mortals.
But the 28/2.8 just isn't bright enough
Hi All,
The UK's Amateur Photographer this week has some info about the 31/1.8 Limited,
Don't know if all these datails have been provided on the list here
is what AP has stated.
Picture shown was both Black and Silver versions !!!
Some Aspherical Elements
Lens Floating mechanism, for
Complete press release is here:
www.penta-club.org/penta/news/2001/pentax_lens35_lim_31_eng.shtml
Den
__
The Penta Magazine - online photo magazine
www.penta-club.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Denis wrote:
BTW: here
http://www.penta-club.org/penta/archive/2001/009/exhibition_03_rus.shtml
I'm writing (yes, right now) article about this lens. But now only Russian
version. English will be later. But images (just one now) of course doesn't
have language :-)
You can see how Pentax
Den,
For the data imprinting, do you know what would be the data
written when using 'B' mode? Would it be the ACTUAL time
the shutter was open, or just 'B' ?
Thanks
Michel
---
Uaooo! Good question!
I don't know :(
.
.
.
.
Sorry... at the MZ-S manual: for bulb exposure, [BU] is imprinted.
Den
-
Michel wrote:
For the data imprinting, do you know what would be the data
written when using 'B' mode? Would it be the ACTUAL time
the shutter was open, or just 'B' ?
Most likely actual exposure time since this is how its done on the 645n.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
.
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: FA31/1.8 AL Limited Specifications
Gerald wrote:
With the 31/1.8 Limited, Pentax has finally offered something close to a
28/2, and have done so without any
Denis wrote:
Hi Gerald and ALL.
IMHO they just meant smooth movement of the lens tube...
I believe it means that the floating machanism ensure optimum optical quality
regardless of focusing distance. Floating elements are usually employed to improve
optical quality at close range.
Pal
Gerald Cermak wrote:
Trust me when I tell you that the current FA35/2 creates no lens envy by
their owners - I have one.
Huh? You mean cosmetically? Everyone else seems to love it's optics.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
I believe it means that the floating machanism ensure optimum optical
quality regardless of focusing distance. Floating elements are usually
employed to improve optical quality at close range.
Pal
---
Of course Paal's English is much better than my :-)
Den
-
This message is from the
12 matches
Mail list logo
