Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-10 Thread aimcompute
Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness Under current international copyright law someone always owns the copyright. Just who that is seems to vary from country to country as Bill Robb and I discovered a while back in a rather long discussion on this list. The Library is not violating copyright

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-09 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
: Flash Diffusers Geekness --- Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this sound like it may work? Any other suggestions? It sounds like something along the lines of copyright infringment, even though there is no artist's name it is still someone's handiwork

Re: Copyrights was: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-09 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
Well, Tom, there is the law and there is reality. It would cost far more than it is worth to sue people for making copies for their own use, not to mention the difficulty even finding out about it. If you run off a couple of thousand copies to sell then you are probably in trouble. The rub that

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 8, 2001 1:13 PM Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness Are you suggesting negative film because of the latitude for error? There can be a lot of contrast issues with using slide film for copying

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread aimcompute
Bill Peifer wrote: I seem to remember a suggestion from a list member regarding a cheap and easy-to-implement flash diffuser. In fact, I think this was Mafud's idea. Get a piece of one of those white styrofoam take-out food packaging trays -- like they might use at McDonalds' :-) Really?

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread aimcompute
- From: Nicholas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:04 PM Subject: RE: Flash Diffusers Geekness --- Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this sound like it may work? Any other suggestions? It sounds like something along the lines

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 8, 2001 1:44 PM Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness But if the work is not copyrighted, how can it be copyright infringement? From what I understand the work belongs to the corporation

Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread Nicholas Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:04 PM Subject: RE: Flash Diffusers Geekness --- Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this sound like it may work? Any other suggestions? It sounds like something along the lines

OT: Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread aimcompute
. Tom C. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers Geekness The second that any work is ~created~ it is copyrighted. It does not have to be registered by the government, although

RE: Flash Diffusers Geekness

2001-06-08 Thread Peter Alling
I would bet that the painting is already a copy of some recognized work painted by an artist resident in China. These paintings are produced by the yard and sold like fixtures to hotels and restaurants. At 12:04 PM 6/8/2001 -0700, you wrote: --- Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]