Flash for LX was MZ-3 vs ZX(or MZ)-5n

I am thinking of getting a small flash for travel together with the LX. There is really small one called Sunpak 2000A Softlite, that seems nice, no TTL however. Would the Pentax AF220T be a better solution? Could it perform the same 'fill-flash'-tricks on an LX? Peter Smekal Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Flash for LX was MZ-3 vs ZX(or MZ)-5n

I am thinking of getting a small flash for travel together with the LX. There is really small one called Sunpak 2000A Softlite, that seems nice, no TTL however. Would the Pentax AF220T be a better solution? Could it perform the same 'fill-flash'-tricks on an LX? Peter Smekal It depends on what

Re: Flash for LX was MZ-3 vs ZX(or MZ)-5n

Peter, I like the AF200T better... Think of it as a small AF280T! All the same tricks with the LX too! Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am thinking of getting a small flash for travel together with the LX. There is really small one called Sunpak 2000A Softlite, that seems nice,

Re: Flash for LX was MZ-3 vs ZX(or MZ)-5n

Under this thread comments about the relationship of the flash to position of the lens if on camera mounted hotshoe flashor bracket attached have been touched on.. Could you address this issue more thouroughly especially with the problems of Portrait vs Landscape modes of orientation.

Re: Flash for LX was MZ-3 vs ZX(or MZ)-5n

Or an used AF200T. regards, Alan Chan I am thinking of getting a small flash for travel together with the LX. There is really small one called Sunpak 2000A Softlite, that seems nice, no TTL however. Would the Pentax AF220T be a better solution? Could it perform the same 'fill-flash'-tricks on