Re: Further DA35 macro thinking (was DA35/2.8 Macro Samples (unofficial))

2008-04-01 Thread Toine
Thanks. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > www.tekade.de > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The lowest price I can find is 369 euros. 310 would be great. Which shop? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Th

Re: Further DA35 macro thinking (was DA35/2.8 Macro Samples (unofficial))

2008-04-01 Thread Thibouille
www.tekade.de On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The lowest price I can find is 369 euros. 310 would be great. Which shop? > > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Also, it is a macro lens but a cheap one for a OEM

Re: Further DA35 macro thinking (was DA35/2.8 Macro Samples (unofficial))

2008-03-31 Thread Toine
The lowest price I can find is 369 euros. 310 would be great. Which shop? On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, it is a macro lens but a cheap one for a OEM brand: 310-340 > euros isn't much and it enables Pentax with a very cheap macro lens. -- PDML P

Further DA35 macro thinking (was DA35/2.8 Macro Samples (unofficial))

2008-03-31 Thread Thibouille
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The 16-50 doesn't vignette or distort much at 35mm. Good to know. > But it is much larger than any 35mm prime in a DSLR mount except the Canon > 35L Indeed. > I tend to be a prime guy from a theoretical perspective.