It's really depressing that it won - also ironic that the moon actually
detracts - he didn't need to insert that to do well
ann
On 3/21/2017 5:07 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Yes it's certainly a misleading image but the only restrictions on
processing in the somewhat lax "rules" for that challeng
Yes it's certainly a misleading image but the only restrictions on
processing in the somewhat lax "rules" for that challenge were "No
watermarks or copyright info on image".
So, strictly speaking, it's probably not cheating.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
John F.:
But the clouds can be from the other side of the Earth... or Moon...
... No, they are from Mars, coming to Moon as a part of the seasons, when
it becomes to cold on Mars... And then going back to Mars.
[BG]
;-)
John Francis Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:47:26 -0700 wrote:
Well, the fact th
The Moon being in front of the clouds is a dead giveaway before I even
bothered to pixel peep.
On 3/21/2017 1:23 PM, Gonz wrote:
Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
sunrise/sunset and clouds...
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:54 AM, wrote:
No comment necessary:
https:
If the photographer had inserted just a sliver of an almost new moon it
would have still been a "winning" image.
On 3/21/2017 2:45 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
sunrise/sunset and clouds...
What, you mean you can't have the
On 21/3/17, Stanley Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>1. The moon was full at 0505 that morning.
>2. The moon set at 0620 on a bearing of 281.4° as seen from the casual
>observers position on Saltlick road. I.e., basically a bit North of West.
>3. The sun rose at 0623 that morning, as you migh
Yes, shocking. lol
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Gonz wrote:
>
>>Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
>>sunrise/sunset and clouds...
>
> What, you mean you can't have the sun setting (or rising) almost
> directly *behind* a full moon? I am shock
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:23:20PM -0500, Gonz wrote:
> Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
> sunrise/sunset and clouds...
Well, the fact that the moon is obscuring some of the clouds is a bit of a
give-away.
(Not to mention the rather obvious dark ring round the moon)
Gonz wrote:
>Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
>sunrise/sunset and clouds...
What, you mean you can't have the sun setting (or rising) almost
directly *behind* a full moon? I am shocked, shocked!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
Ok ok yes I believed you. But I had to check anyway…
On Oct 12, 2011 when the photo was allegedly taken,
in the Masai Mara where the dastardly deed was done,
in the early morning as implied by the title of the image:
1. The moon was full at 0505 that morning.
2. The moon set at 0620 on a bearing
Not a great cutout either. Pretty clear artifacts along the circumference.
I think there's an exposé thread about it going on too.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gonz wrote:
> Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
> sunrise/sunset and clouds...
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 20
Moon was photoshopped in? Looks like it, not consistent with
sunrise/sunset and clouds...
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:54 AM, wrote:
> No comment necessary:
> https://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=1022446
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mail
No comment necessary:
https://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=1022446
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
13 matches
Mail list logo
