Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-26 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Shawn K. Subject: RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions) Well, its bad to store records lying flat, probably bad for CD's too. I've had to use the spindles though as I've got literally hundreds of CDR's around here, though the most important ones

RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-26 Thread Steve Desjardins
Quite frankly, my negatives are in a jumble but my files are on CD. When it goes out of style, I'll copy them over to the new medium. Presumably, this won't happen while I'm sleeping ;-) OTOH, a library might find such a switch more daunting. For this reason, any new medium is also going to

RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Shawn K.
Storing data on multiple hard-drives is the best way to go IMO... Actually, having a networked computer working as a dedicated server with a RAID array is the best way to archive anything. Yes, it's expensive... ish.. I built a P3 950 from almost nothing for about 250 dollars and I have it

RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Rob Studdert
On 25 May 2004 at 14:11, Shawn K. wrote: Storing data on multiple hard-drives is the best way to go IMO... Actually, having a networked computer working as a dedicated server with a RAID array is the best way to archive anything. Yes, it's expensive... ish.. I built a P3 950 from almost

RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Mark Stringer
I think redundancy is the key. Just have backup offsite. -Original Message- From: Shawn K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions) Hi mark, That sounds like a terrible situation

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Otis Wright
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 6:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions) On 25 May 2004 at 14:11, Shawn K. wrote: Storing data on multiple hard-drives is the best way to go IMO... Actually, having a networked computer working as a dedicated

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Otis Wright
-Original Message- From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Implications for Film (storage opinions) On 25 May 2004 at 19:08, Shawn K. wrote: Well Rob, from what I've heard the government uses hard drives to archive

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Otis Wright
Speaking of Canberra, seem to recall some very interesting systems at CSIRO's Black Mountain Complex. Still exist? Otis Wright Rob Studdert wrote: On 25 May 2004 at 19:41, Shawn K. wrote: Alright, lets just say I know someone in the government and this someone says that the government uses

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Rob Studdert
On 25 May 2004 at 23:33, Otis Wright wrote: Speaking of Canberra, seem to recall some very interesting systems at CSIRO's Black Mountain Complex. Still exist? I've only ever been involved in the ABC/SBS broadcast side of the comms tower, I really don't know what else they've got going on

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Rob Studdert
On 25 May 2004 at 23:09, Otis Wright wrote: No matter which media you prefer, keeping your data all in one location or on one media system carries a risk that I would prefer to avoid. Just my opinion based on the dozen or so catastrophic data loss occurrences I deal with each year.

Re: Implications for Film (storage opinions)

2004-05-25 Thread Anthony Farr
- Original Message - From: Shawn K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (snip) I have had cd's that were guaranteed to last 90 years go bad after 2 years. They were kept on my desk on a spindle, some of the disks at the bottom of the spindle went bad, oh well. I didn't lose anything important