seems weird to me that pentax is telling all those handling the
pre-production samples of the cameras not to comment on the
image quality of the cameras at such a late date. Are they expecting
some miracle firmware to come in an save the day at the last second?
Could there be a fly in the
I'm wondering the same thing myself. A lot of people are concerned
with shadow noise and banding. Its actually pretty normal for
companies to prevent people from saving images on preproduction
cameras, but I don't know why people aren't allowed to talk about IQ.
I'm just patiently waiting for
On 13/10/2013 12:47 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
seems weird to me that pentax is telling all those handling the
pre-production samples of the cameras not to comment on the
image quality of the cameras at such a late date. Are they expecting
some miracle firmware to come in an save the day at the
To me it makes perfect sense. Until product is fully out, it makes
absolutely no sense to publish any samples. Not once and not twice
such disclosure had produced very untoward effects to gear makers.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/10/2013 12:47
I think it is an interesting question. While one site said that
Pentax/Ricoh did not want images produced from pre-production
firmware, it is obvious from the official samples that they do have
v1.00 firmware (although it may not be the version installed on the
pre-production cameras). I tend to
I was listening to the This Week In Photography podcast yesterday.
The K3 was mentioned in the news section and discussed a bit. Derrick
Story was very positive about Pentax. He said he had been given a
K-2 for review. I think he meant K-7, because he mentioned it in
earlier blog posts.
6 matches
Mail list logo
