Re: K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies

2009-05-22 Thread Thibouille
>> Sent: 22 May 2009 19:19 >> To: Pentax List >> Subject: K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies >> >> >>            W     H    D >> K-7:      131 x  97 x 73 mm >> *ist-D:   129 x  95 x 60 mm >> K10D:     142 x 101 x 70 mm >> K200D:  

RE: K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies

2009-05-22 Thread Bob W
Fascinating. But I'll bet it can't pee up a wall as high as a Nikon. Bob > -Original Message- > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On > Behalf Of John Francis > Sent: 22 May 2009 19:19 > To: Pentax List > Subject: K-7 size compared

Re: K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies

2009-05-22 Thread Adam Maas
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM, John Francis wrote: >  o  The K-7 is pretty close to the size of the Olympus E620, >    except for the extra depth (most of which is probably >    due to the register distance). > The difference between the E620 and the K7 is the grip, not the mount register. The

K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies

2009-05-22 Thread John Francis
W HD K-7: 131 x 97 x 73 mm *ist-D: 129 x 95 x 60 mm K10D: 142 x 101 x 70 mm K200D:135 x 97 x 77 mm MX: 136 x 83 x 50 mm ME: 131 x 83 x 50 mm LX: 145 x 91 x 50 mm MZ-5n:135 x 90 x 62 mm MZ-S: 137 x 95 x 64 mm PZ-1p:152 x 96 x