Re: K 18 f/3.5 on Digital (was Any screens for manual focusing on*istDS?)

2006-11-15 Thread John Whittingham
Hi Shel I used to use that hood with the 18mm on film cameras, but it looked like a huge baking dish ;-)) I hated it. And it's way bigger than need be for the DSLR. I think it was you who suggested the Tak 24mm hood to me and I just happened to have one I bought by mistake! Works well

Re: K 18 f/3.5 on Digital (was Any screens for manual focusing on*istDS?)

2006-11-15 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote: OK. I think that on this lens - and a few others - the front filter can really degrade the image as the front element is strongly curved. Ah, so this is why some come with built-in filters. Thanks Shel. Kostas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: K 18 f/3.5 on Digital (was Any screens for manual focusing on*istDS?)

2006-11-15 Thread John Whittingham
OK. I think that on this lens - and a few others - the front filter can really degrade the image as the front element is strongly curved. Ah, so this is why some come with built-in filters. Thanks Shel. One of the problems with the 18mm f/3.5 is, if you use filters you occasionally get

Re: K 18 f/3.5 on Digital (was Any screens for manual focusing on*istDS?)

2006-11-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
OK. I think that on this lens - and a few others - the front filter can really degrade the image as the front element is strongly curved. I don't use a filter, but I have found a pretty good lens hood. Try a Nikon HN-3 (which is a 52mm thread) used with a 58mm - 52mm step down ring. There will

Re: K 18 f/3.5 on Digital (was Any screens for manual focusing on*istDS?)

2006-11-14 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I used to use that hood with the 18mm on film cameras, but it looked like a huge baking dish ;-)) I hated it. And it's way bigger than need be for the DSLR. Ultimately, a list member made me a custom hood, which was tulip shaped and much, much smaller, which was designed for use with a film