Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-18 Thread whickersworld
Rob Brigham wrote: Eh? But I had already drunk half of it (the bottom half)! LOL!!! I was only kidding ... ;-)

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-18 Thread Frits Wüthrich
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 21:47, Cotty wrote: (34 deg c today, mags court biker doing 154 mph + Fairford Air Tatoo preshoot, BBQ Koftas plus salad and a pint each of Wychwood's Fiddlers Elbow and Marston's Pedigree followed by a very large Bailey's Irish Cream (whiskey) on the

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 11:27:11 PM, you wrote: My, aren't you preciousd! what's precious about it? Somebody else raised this, and I merely joined in. Everything there is just a plain fact, which I thought some people might find interesting and amusing in the context. If you don't that's

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Cotty
My, aren't you preciousd! what's precious about it? Somebody else raised this, and I merely joined in. Everything there is just a plain fact, which I thought some people might find interesting and amusing in the context. If you don't that's fine, but you don't have to react like a twat. He

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Chris Stoddart
Quote may be inaccurate but the point is self-evident. Those Brits have a fascinating handle on the concept of time. :) Reminds me of the old 'joke' that goes: Two American tourists arrive at Runnymede at the side of the Thames to find loads of people running around in Medieval costume.

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Dan Matyola
Bob: Here, that is quite a vulgar term. Of course, we're not as cultured as you are over there, living in ancient baronial estates. Bob Walkden wrote: what's precious about it? Somebody else raised this, and I merely joined in. Everything there is just a plain fact, which I thought some

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Caveman
whickersworld wrote: The literal translation of Pont Neuf is Bridge 9. Where did New come from? neuf, neuve adj. et n. m. I. adj. 1. Qui est fait depuis peu. Maison neuve. 2. Qui na pas encore servi. Un habit neuf. Loc. Faire peau neuve: muer, en parlant du serpent; fig. se transformer

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Herb Chong
it means the same thing in Old English as it does now on both sides of the ocean. Herb - Original Message - From: Dan Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 09:32 Subject: Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not Here, that is quite a vulgar term

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Michel Carrre-Ge
Caveman a crit: whickersworld wrote: The literal translation of Pont Neuf is Bridge 9. Where did New come from? neuf, neuve adj. et n. m. I. adj. 1. Qui est fait depuis peu. Maison neuve. 2. Qui na pas encore servi. Un habit neuf. Loc. Faire peau neuve: muer, en parlant du serpent; fig. se

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Caveman
Michel Carrre-Ge a crit: Caveman a crit: That should be L'homme des cavernes a crit: ;-)

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 9:13:25 AM, you wrote: Reminds me of the old 'joke' that goes: Two American tourists arrive at Runnymede at the side of the Thames to find loads of people running around in Medieval costume. They stop a passing minstrel. Say Buddy, what's going on? We're

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 11:14:41 AM, you wrote: Bob Walkden wrote: We're not the only ones. The French do it too. The Pont Neuf (New Bridge) was built in the 1500s - and is the oldest bridge over the Seine. The literal translation of Pont Neuf is Bridge 9. Where did New come

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-16 Thread Michel Carrre-Ge
Caveman a crit: Michel Carrre-Ge a crit: Caveman a crit: That should be L'homme des cavernes a crit: ;-) Cave ou caverne ??

LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Anton Browne
Don't wish to be boring but can we eradicate the growing tendency to stick an e on the end of lens. It's incorrect, unnecessary, and a waste of a keystroke. Unless of course these folk are using the Tasmanian Aboriginal spelling, in which case I apologise profusely AB

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread brooksdj
Unless of course these folk are using the Tasmanian Aboriginal spelling, in which case I apologise profusely AB Apology accepted.vbg Dave

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Bill Owens
Or unless they've intended it to be plural and left off the last 's' (lenses) :-) Bill - Original Message - From: Anton Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:27 PM Subject: LENS it is, LENSE it is not Don't wish to be boring but can we

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Steve Desjardins
According to Merriam-Webster (10 Ed) both lens and lense are acceptable as the singular form of the noun. I suspect it might be one of those cases where the error became so common that it was just accepted as legitimate. It also cites (right below) the use of lens as a transitive verb meaning

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Leonard Paris
I'd use the pseudonym of Grey Lensman but E. E. Smith would probably send Rod the Rock Kinnison to break both of my knees. ;-) Len --- From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:41

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Bill Owens
Is it one of those American/Brit things. You know, Yank-color Bloke-colour, Yank-lens Bloke-lense. :-) Bill

RE: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Len Paris
We da Tasmanians laik our lenses wid some e on da end. It maiks da flair go avay... --- Boris Liberman www.geocities.com/dunno57 Never type with your mouth full. It makes you sound funny. :-) Len ---

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Cotty
Don't wish to be boring but can we eradicate the growing tendency to stick an e on the end of lens. It's incorrect, unnecessary, and a waste of a keystroke. Bloodye helle Ie couldn'te agreee moree, thise dispiccablee habite hase gote toe stope! (34 deg c today, mags court biker doing 154 mph +

RE: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Shaun Canning
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.heritageservices.com.au -Original Message- From: Anton Browne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 2:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LENS it is, LENSE it is not Don't wish to be boring but can we eradicate the growing tendency to stick an e

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:54:20 PM, you wrote: As when C. S. Lewis, portrayed by Anthony Hopkins in the movie Shadowlands, provided his lady friend with a tour of Cambridge University: That's the new building. When was it built? 1733 Quote may be inaccurate but the point is

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 10:07:07 PM, you wrote: Is it one of those American/Brit things. You know, Yank-color Bloke-colour, Yank-lens Bloke-lense. :-) Bill it's not a current British spelling. I always assumed it was American ignorance - a back formation from the plural. -- Cheers

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Dan Matyola
My, aren't you preciousd! Bob Walkden wrote: well, that's very new indeed. Most of us live in houses that you guys would treat as museums. My house was built in 1896 and is perfectly ordinary. My sister's was built in 1837, which is no age at all. My boarding house at school was built in 1585.

Re: LENS it is, LENSE it is not

2003-07-15 Thread Joseph Tainter
It drives crazy when vendors do this on eBay. And they do it in ignorance, not because lense is an acceptable spelling in a dictionary they have never consulted. Joe