On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
>> collective noun.
>
>Umm, someone has to ask this.
>
>Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar
>Metamorphosis?
And surely if it
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:21:10 -0500 (EST), D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> > > And surely if it can rain cats and dogs it can hale Cesars?
> > Now what could have precipitated that remark?
>
> Mark, you're not helping -- and if you're not part of the solution...
You're either pa
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
> For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
> collective noun.
Umm, someone has to ask this.
Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar
Metamorphosi
On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
collective noun.
>>>
>>>Umm, someone has to ask this.
>>>
>>>Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar
>>>Metamorphosis?
>>
>> And surely if it can rain cats and
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:39 AM
--
-- On 31/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
--
-- >> For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
-- >> collective noun.
-- >
-- >Umm, someone has to ask this..
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Larry Levy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:18 PM
--
--
-- Joe asked:
-- A flock of LXs?
-- A herd of LXs?
-- A gaggle of LXs?
-- An exaltation of LXs?
--
-- Grammarians on the list, please help.
--
-- From my being a member of thi
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:13 AM
--
--
-- - Original Message -
-- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- > Umm, someone has to ask this.
-- >
-- > Would a person buying several LXes then be doing
--
-- -Original Message-
-- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:17 PM
--
--
-- - Original Message -
-- From: "Cesar Matamoros II"
-- Subject: RE: LXist
--
--
-- > Cotty,
-- >
-- > For the cause I will gladly let my na
Enough to have the effect of LXativessorry...
-Original Message-
From: Larry Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, November 01, 2003 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: LXist
>Joe asked:
>A flock of LXs?
>A herd of LXs?
>A gaggl
Joe asked:
A flock of LXs?
A herd of LXs?
A gaggle of LXs?
An exaltation of LXs?
Grammarians on the list, please help.
>From my being a member of this list for only a relatively short time, the
answer is evident:
A pride of LXes
Larry
On 31/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
>> collective noun.
>
>Umm, someone has to ask this.
>
>Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar Metamorphosis?
And surely if it can rain cats and dogs it can hale C
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Umm, someone has to ask this.
>
> Would a person buying several LXes then be doing
a Cesar Metamorphosis?
>
> WW.
>
and you would be the person to ask it.
WAAA WAAA WAAA
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Cesar Matamoros II"
Subject: RE: LXist
> Cotty,
>
> For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
> collective noun.
Umm, someone has to ask this.
Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar Metamorphosis?
WW.
Cotty,
For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
collective noun.
I have to have something in case Roving PDML Ambassador gets taken by
someone else:-)
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Thursday, O
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Re: LXist
>
>
>
> > And I've got 3 F3's which is more than enough to qualify as a "burden" of
> > F3s!
>
Whould that not be the TV & "professional" assistant version? :)
>
>D. Glenn suggested a "clique." How about a "ka-chunk"? ;-)
>
>Cheers,
>Stephen
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Doug Franklin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:19:51 -0500, Stephen Moore wrote:
>
> > D. Glenn suggested a "clique." How about a "ka-chunk"? ;-)
> > (Us LXers get to make those kinds of jokes, heh-heh.)
>
> How about a "network" because they ping when the shutter trips ... or
Stephen Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Doug Franklin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:25:54 -0800, Bob Blakely wrote:
>>
>> > A murder of LXs? (Black like crows.)
>> > An arsenal of LXs? (You shoot them. I particularly like this one.)
>>
>> Us rednecks just call it a s***pot of them. :-)
>
On 30/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>The real question is whether 3 LXs would be a CLXXX
Surely the collective noun for 3 or more LXs (d'oh) is a 'Cesar' ?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
her the original word
was derived from greek or latin.
The real question is whether 3 LXs would be a CLXXX
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
-Original Message-
From: David Madsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LXi
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LXist
> And I've got 3 F3's which is more than enough to qualify as a "burden" of
> F3s!
Ah yes, the F3. The best camera I never liked when I owned one. Absolutely
reliable, tough as nails,
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "jtainter"
> Subject: LXist
>
>
> > Will Robb wrote:
> >
> > 'Plural of LX is LXs.
> > As in, "I have three LXs".'
> >
> > So,
Hi,
Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 7:06:44 PM, you wrote:
> Will Robb wrote:
> 'Plural of LX is LXs.
> As in, "I have three LXs".'
> So, Wheatfield, do you have:
> A flock of LXs?
> A herd of LXs?
> A gaggle of LXs?
> An exaltation of LXs?
> Grammarians on the list, please help.
3 of them must
>From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>A murder of LXs? (Black like crows.)
>An arsenal of LXs? (You shoot them. I particularly like this one.)
>
>Also...
>A battery of lenses? (Some are large enough to look like
>small cannon.)
>A constellation of flashes, lights?
>
>A can of film? (Am
Joe asked:
> A flock of LXs?
> A herd of LXs?
> A gaggle of LXs?
> An exaltation of LXs?
>
> Grammarians on the list, please help.
A clique of LXs/LXen.
-- Glenn
A murder of LXs? (Black like crows.)
An arsenal of LXs? (You shoot them. I particularly like this one.)
Also...
A battery of lenses? (Some are large enough to look like small cannon.)
A constellation of flashes, lights?
A can of film? (Ammo comes in cans.)
Regards,
Bob...
> From: jtainter [mail
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter"
Subject: LXist
> Will Robb wrote:
>
> 'Plural of LX is LXs.
> As in, "I have three LXs".'
>
> So, Wheatfield, do you have:
>
> A flock of LXs?
> A herd of LXs?
> A gaggle of LXs?
>
At 02:06 PM 10/29/03, throwing caution to the wind, jtainter wrote:
Will Robb wrote:
'Plural of LX is LXs.
As in, "I have three LXs".'
So, Wheatfield, do you have:
A flock of LXs?
A herd of LXs?
A gaggle of LXs?
An exaltation of LXs?
Grammarians on the list, please help.
Joe
a coven
Will Robb wrote:
'Plural of LX is LXs.
As in, "I have three LXs".'
So, Wheatfield, do you have:
A flock of LXs?
A herd of LXs?
A gaggle of LXs?
An exaltation of LXs?
Grammarians on the list, please help.
Joe
29 matches
Mail list logo
