On Wed, Jan 27, 2016, at 04:40 AM, steve harley wrote:
> On 2016-01-25 21:38 , P.J. Alling wrote:
> > The felt doesn't have to wear out, it was perfect on the 43mm limited's cap
> > and yet I still have no idea where it went.
>
> i made a point of quickly replacing the similar cap on my DA 35 Macr
On 2016-01-25 21:38 , P.J. Alling wrote:
The felt doesn't have to wear out, it was perfect on the 43mm limited's cap
and yet I still have no idea where it went.
i made a point of quickly replacing the similar cap on my DA 35 Macro Ltd
for just that reason
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
much prefer the newer plastic caps with
the positive retention feature that engages the filter threads.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Walters
Subject: Re: My latest Pentax enablement...
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, at 08:22 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
...is at least as old as I am (but in a l
: My latest Pentax enablement...
>
>On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, at 08:22 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> ...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot better shape):
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/24611705305/
>
>
>I have one of those, too - bought several years ago durin
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> I've also got an all black version which, I assume, was a slightly later
> issue. I've really got to start using some of these old Takumars.
I believe the all-black preset version of the 135mm f/3.5 started around 1961.
-
Life is too short
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, at 08:22 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> ...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot better shape):
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/24611705305/
I have one of those, too - bought several years ago during my collecting
phase (it's a disease - fortunately I'm now over it,
Been hitting the peppermint schnaps again?
On 1/25/2016 5:40 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
None of the above. But I am minty.
On 25 Jan 2016, at 22:10, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
Coatings blemish-free? Helicoid smooth? No fungus? Get yourself on Ebay.
On 25 January 2016 at 21:53 Bob W-PDML wrote:
None of the above. But I am minty.
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 22:10, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
>
> Coatings blemish-free? Helicoid smooth? No fungus? Get yourself on Ebay.
>
>> On 25 January 2016 at 21:53 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>
>>
>> Goes all the way to 11
>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:47, WILSON MIC
Hey, I had one of those! fine lens.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> ...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot better shape):
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/24611705305/
>
> Arrived today and will
Coatings blemish-free? Helicoid smooth? No fungus? Get yourself on Ebay.
> On 25 January 2016 at 21:53 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>
> Goes all the way to 11
>
> > On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:47, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
> >
> > As long as your aperture's still snappy, you have nothing to worry about.
> >
I'm told that filter size is more important than focal length.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Goes all the way to 11
>
>> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:47, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
>>
>> As long as your aperture's still snappy, you have nothing to worry about.
>>
>>> On 25 January 201
Goes all the way to 11
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:47, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
>
> As long as your aperture's still snappy, you have nothing to worry about.
>
>> On 25 January 2016 at 21:34 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>>
>>
>> Same year as me. My knurls are more worn than those.
>>
>> B
>>
>>> On 25 Jan 2
As long as your aperture's still snappy, you have nothing to worry about.
> On 25 January 2016 at 21:34 Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>
> Same year as me. My knurls are more worn than those.
>
> B
>
> > On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:23, Darren Addy wrote:
> >
> > ...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot b
Same year as me. My knurls are more worn than those.
B
> On 25 Jan 2016, at 21:23, Darren Addy wrote:
>
> ...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot better shape):
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/24611705305/
>
> Arrived today and will take its place among its preset brethren. I'v
...is at least as old as I am (but in a lot better shape):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/24611705305/
Arrived today and will take its place among its preset brethren. I've
wanted this style of Pentax lens cap for a long, long time.
--
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
--
Excellent! I had forgotten about couplers like that. Perfect. Thanks
for the link.
By the way, my sister took the morning off work to attempt to see the
small flock of Whooping Cranes reported in Thayer County Nebraska. She
succeeded, but says they are a long ways away. She also reports that
the P
Here's one way to do it...
https://app.box.com/s/ocih5z0bdaqnhxysng635r7kr7wjrudq
-p
On 11/17/2015 5:03 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Interesting! Thanks for the pic.
I wouldn't think it would be too hard to cobble something functional
together that would duplicate the functionality. It's basically
I have Pentax 8x24 UCF WR binox (made in Japan) that I'm very happy with.
Since I usually use them hiking or at concerts, I've never tried using
the tripod socket.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I see they are $27 on Amazon.
> That was
I see they are $27 on Amazon.
That was good for a laugh.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:46 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 4:52 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> I can see how their style would have made them a good futuristic looking
>> prop.
>>
>> I believe that they normally say that 10x is the m
Interesting! Thanks for the pic.
I wouldn't think it would be too hard to cobble something functional
together that would duplicate the functionality. It's basically just
1/4"-20 threads on one end and a t-nut same thread at the other, held
together with some kind of structure and/or epoxy like JB
On 11/17/2015 4:52 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I can see how their style would have made them a good futuristic looking prop.
I believe that they normally say that 10x is the most one should
attempt to handhold (without it becoming annoying trying to keep it
steady). I was pleased (and surprised) to
I can see how their style would have made them a good futuristic looking prop.
I believe that they normally say that 10x is the most one should
attempt to handhold (without it becoming annoying trying to keep it
steady). I was pleased (and surprised) to see that these have a tripod
socket on the u
I bought a pair of the 16x24 back when they were expensive. In a
relate note, StarGate SG1 used a prop made out of the a PENTAX binocular
Shell, which was used a few episodes. They do look pretty cool as well
as being very good binoculars. The only issue is holding 16x24 steady.
On 11/17/
http://goo.gl/Teq6NE
A while back I found a neat set of Pentax UCF Mini 8x21 binoculars
(Made in Japan) and they are really nice. Incredibly lightweight, yet
good image quality (though with small objectives, not made for low
light). I liked them so well that when I tripped across a (New in the
box
24 matches
Mail list logo
