It doesn't work for me any more. Early infatuation:-).
Paul
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:53 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/11/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty. But I wanted that highlight blasting out from this
shot. It's off the curve, so why not?
If it works for you then it's
On Nov 12, 2007 8:04 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't work for me any more. Early infatuation:-).
Out of context, we could have a bit of fun with that line.
;-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Lindsey Again
On 11/11/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty. But I wanted that highlight blasting out from this
shot. It's off the curve, so why not?
If it works for you then it's
century in
the ad biz, I'm a firm believer in the power of research and consensus.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Lindsey Again
On 11/11/07, Paul
The shadows cast by her shoulder and hair are quite noticeable and
dominant near her right shoulder - I think too much so.
--
Bruce
Sunday, November 11, 2007, 12:50:24 PM, you wrote:
PS This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
PS the pics Lindsey and I chose to
I agree. It's an attempt at uniqueness that didn't quite make the grade.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The shadows cast by her shoulder and hair are quite noticeable and
dominant near her right shoulder - I think too much so.
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different.
Rather than taming the highlights, I chose to let it ramp down from
them. What say you?
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6628457size=lg
--
PDML
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different.
Rather than taming the highlights, I chose to let it ramp down from
them. What say you?
For me it doesn't work. The bright reflection in the clock is too
distracting.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 3:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Lindsey Again
Looks more like Lindsey 3:27 VBG
Note one that I would haven't chosen but if its what she wants - so be it.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Lindsey Again
This is probably off the mark for a model
Like the soft shoulders/upper body area.. The lighter right shoulder
and hair shadow is subtle enough (for me) as to become a contour
enhancing benefit.
The clock reflections (flash?) are distracting.
I want her face to be a little lighter, but then that may be my monitor
again.
The fact that she,
On 11/11/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different.
Rather than taming the highlights, I chose to let it ramp down from
them. What say you?
No, it's not your monitor. It's very dark compared to the other
selects. Just wanted to see what the list thought. I'll post the
compiled selects for those who are interested. This one is definitely
off the map. But I didn't want to change it. Hot spot on the clock.
Dark face. That's what
Thanks for the feedback.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different.
Rather than taming
Thanks Cotty. But I wanted that highlight blasting out from this
shot. It's off the curve, so why not?
On Nov 11, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/11/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and
In a message dated 11/11/2007 1:04:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is probably off the mark for a model portfolio, but it's one of
the pics Lindsey and I chose to send to her agent. It's different.
Rather than taming the highlights, I chose to let it ramp
Yeah, I think we got caught up in the moment. In retrospect, I don't
like it. Too many pics, too little time.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/11/2007 1:04:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is probably off the mark
On 11/11/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty. But I wanted that highlight blasting out from this
shot. It's off the curve, so why not?
If it works for you then it's successful.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
18 matches
Mail list logo
