On 8 Oct 2003 at 19:51, Keith Whaley wrote:
> You mean double back tape?
I think so, it's just the sticky bit, no substrate as such, it can get out of
control.
> I think that would be a good idea, except I don't know how much/many
> temp excursions it will take.
Well I did my hardest working L
I actually use a very thin pressure sensitive tape. The tape can be laid on
the
back of the covering then trimmed accurately using a knife from the front
face.
The backing paper is then simply peeled away and the covering stuck back
on. I
personally wouldn't touch glues, I've seen the mess repai
Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> On 8 Oct 2003 at 21:51, graywolf wrote:
>
> > http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/restore.htm
> >
> > Most folks use Pliobond, but any contact adhesive will work. Use as thin
> > a coat as posible.
>
> I actually use a very thin pressure sensitive tape.
You mean doub
On 8 Oct 2003 at 21:51, graywolf wrote:
> http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/restore.htm
>
> Most folks use Pliobond, but any contact adhesive will work. Use as thin
> a coat as posible.
I actually use a very thin pressure sensitive tape. The tape can be laid on the
back of the covering then
http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/restore.htm
Most folks use Pliobond, but any contact adhesive will work. Use as thin
a coat as posible.
Mat Maessen wrote:
Does anyone have a good source for camera foam, and recommendations on
what sort of glue to use to glue it in place, and glue the leat
5 matches
Mail list logo
