Re: Memorial Park REDUX

2011-10-14 Thread Tim Bray
Ah... very atmospheric, made me smile. Could do with a little leveling? -T On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Don Guthrie wrote: > This is a redo of a picture I posted in late Sept. Stan and several other > posters kindly (and strongly suggested) I missed the angle on the subject. > > I replaced t

Re: Memorial Park REDUX

2011-10-14 Thread Brian Walters
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:28 PM, "Don Guthrie" wrote: > This is a redo of a picture I posted in late Sept. Stan and several > other posters kindly (and strongly suggested) I missed the angle on the > subject. > > I replaced the one there with new one I took last week. One is highly > p

Re: Memorial Park REDUX

2011-10-12 Thread Stan Halpin
Thanks Don, I think this is much improved. I could quibble a bit about the post-processing (maybe just a touch too much, but I prefer the processed version to the natural) and the framing (the eagle is too centered, I would crop some off the left edge) but those are minor quibbles. I think this

Re: Memorial Park REDUX

2011-10-12 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
I think this version is much stronger than the original. of the two, I prefer the lighter sky, but both are well composed and effective. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Don Guthrie wrote: > This is a redo of a picture I posted in la

Memorial Park REDUX

2011-10-12 Thread Don Guthrie
This is a redo of a picture I posted in late Sept. Stan and several other posters kindly (and strongly suggested) I missed the angle on the subject. I replaced the one there with new one I took last week. One is highly post processed and the other is not for those who prefer the basics. No