JCOC This got me thinking. Do any of the current
JCOC DSLRs have a multi scan mode with low light conditions
JCOC so you could put the camera on a tripod and get better
JCOC noise performance or is a simple long exposure time good enuff to do
JCOC the job?
IIRC, just about any digicam, not
But the Pentax 67 can't take any backs, and the ones on the Pentax 645
are inserts, not full backs.
So what. All Pentax needs to do is introduce a digital only body that will
take the 645 lenses (and via the adapter, 67 lenses) and that is taken care
of. A digital only body would be a clean
AFAIK, p67 is used mostly in field.
assuming this is so, now, if one decides to lug all that glass and metal with
him (along with a big tripod), instead of 35mm gear, the reason must be (unless
the person is out there to get some fitness excercise) to get the maximum
quality on the film, short
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Michael Reichmann's take on current marketplace (inc stuff on
Pentax digital)
But the Pentax 67 can't take any backs, and the ones on the Pentax 645
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Everyone keeps saying that Pentax is used
exclusively in the field...
Everyone I've talked to has told me that the 6x7
(67, 67II) are used almost
exclusively by fashion photographers.
I haven't used my 67 in a field yet.
I did take it up a
David wrote:
Everyone keeps saying that Pentax is used exclusively in the field...
No. Almost exclusively...
Everyone I've talked to has told me that the 6x7 (67, 67II) are used almost
exclusively by fashion photographers.
How many fashion photographers are there?
If the 67 had been
From http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/get-it.shtml;
Manufacturers. Don't get me started! Well, maybe a little.
The saying goes that The Internet changes everything, and to some
extent it's true. But try telling that to some of the large Japanese
manufacturers. Epson is a good example.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 5:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Michael Reichmann's take on current marketplace (inc stuff on
Pentax digital)
From http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/get-it.shtml;
Manufacturers. Don't get me started! Well, maybe a little
on the LCD if you wanted.
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Michael Reichmann's take on current marketplace
(inc stuff on Pentax digital)
but arent all high end digital cameras
SLRS? I
Hi Rob,
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham
original totally snipped
I read the original article in addition to your message. The things I got
out of it are different than what was presented.
Digital will come, but it is not here yet. In the consumer area, it has
arrived -
, September 02, 2002 5:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Michael Reichmann's take on current marketplace (inc stuff
on Pentax digital)
Or they could put a digital viewfinder on it. The nice thing about this
would be that you could ALWAYS have DOF preview engaged, and not have a
dark
He has an article about that too:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/d60-night.shtml Seems that
up to 30 secs exposure the D60 aint too bad, unlike many others, so I
guess they are getting there. I have never heard of a multiscan for
this, but its an interesting idea.
-Original
12 matches
Mail list logo