Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Shaun Canning
None taken at all Mike. I apologize for inadvertently starting this little s*%t storm. I forget that people can be a little irrational about this stuff sometimes We're not quite as tied up in it as other places seem to be, and many of us just copped it on the chin, got on with our lives, an

Virtues of coatings Was: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Treena
on to research. I wonder how the 'ghostless' coating would perform under those circumstances? ;) - Original Message - From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 9:12 AM Subject: Re: NO GUN TALK >

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Pål Jensen
Bob wrote: > F*ck. The 12 or so actual OT posts were entirely without animosity. Now the > rabid anti OT folks, pushing the topic to beyond 40 posts so and climbing, > are flaming each other! > > I love it! Right! The rabid anti-OT foilks should use their consitutional right to remain silent

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Bob Blakely
F*ck. The 12 or so actual OT posts were entirely without animosity. Now the rabid anti OT folks, pushing the topic to beyond 40 posts so and climbing, are flaming each other! I love it! My next post will detail my colonoscopy and the Pentax "probe" used by my doctor. A lively discussion (or dead

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Keith Whaley
Plönck! keith Pål Jensen wrote: > > Keith wrote: > > > Let's drop it ~ AND the irrational responses to any unpleasant subject > > that raises it's ugly head... > > Why don't you start living by your own words instead of posting ten mails with the >same nonsensical contents? > If you want thi

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Pål Jensen
Keith wrote: > Let's drop it ~ AND the irrational responses to any unpleasant subject > that raises it's ugly head... Why don't you start living by your own words instead of posting ten mails with the same nonsensical contents? If you want this to go on forever your recipy so far has been fault

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Keith Whaley
Dr E D F Williams wrote: > > Guns and gun control are way, way, out of line on PDML. If I see another I'm > off. > > Don Okay, they are not a subject for discussion, but you're being irrational. Let's stay calm until this blows over, okay? Why should you suffer by absenting yourself from a lis

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-07 Thread Dr E D F Williams
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 3:09 AM Subject: NO GUN TALK > > register them...our governement took them away from us. We had to > > register our guns 15 years ago. Now I see it as the first step in the > > process of taking all our gun

Re: NO GUN TALK

2002-12-06 Thread William Robb
Sorry Mike. William Robb

NO GUN TALK

2002-12-06 Thread Mike Johnston
> register them...our governement took them away from us. We had to > register our guns 15 years ago. Now I see it as the first step in the > process of taking all our guns away. Shaun, No offense, but gun control and gun rights are an absolutely verboten topic around here. This ain't the place.