Otis Wright, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't like the performance of Netscape 6.0 and quickly ran into more tech
problems and support issues than I had the patience to deal with. (I'll save
my comments on quality control in this industry for another forum.) I went back
to 4.7, which works
Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone tried Netscape 6.2? I've downloaded it but haven't installed it. Sounds
like I should stick with 4.6, which is what I'm running now.
Works fine. 6.0 was a crappy, buggy release, as are most x.0 releases of
anything seem to be these days. NS is now up to 6.2.1 has
Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone tried Netscape 6.2? I've downloaded it but haven't installed it.
Sounds
like I should stick with 4.6, which is what I'm running now.
Netscape Composer 6.2.1 is horrible. They fixed some things which were
problems in 4.75, like text wrapping around photos, but added
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:34:18 -0500, Robert Harris wrote:
You may want to do what I have done -- keep both. They do not interfere
with each other as long as you install them in different directories.
Actually, to be able to use all of the web sites I want to use, I ended
up with four
Robert Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone tried Netscape 6.2? I've downloaded it but haven't installed it. Sounds
like I should stick with 4.6, which is what I'm running now.
Works fine. 6.0 was a crappy, buggy release, as are most x.0 releases of
anything seem to be
5 matches
Mail list logo
