Dave
I dont remember if that is the tkina 80-200/2.8 I have. Mine is manusl focus
and ehen I nail focus it is pretty sharp.
My shots from last night were shot with it. Some eith a tsmron 2x.
I dont have thr exact url but its the most recent set, of Kim Nalley at
Http://flickr.com/ellarsee
Look
Tokina At-x sd 80-200/2.8
Not the pro. It will take some time to learn how to get the most out of it,
but it certainly has potential.
l...@red4est.com wrote:
Dave
I dont remember if that is the tkina 80-200/2.8 I have. Mine is manusl
focus and ehen I nail focus it is pretty sharp.
My
I've got the auto-focus version. I think it's a damn good lens. I
haven't noticed fringing.
From: David Mann
That reminds me. Sorry to hijack the thread but does anyone have
experience with the Tokina ATX Pro 80-200 f/2.8? I've seen one selling
locally and a bit of googling shows some people
It does appear that people are happier with the AT-X Pro but I
haven't figured out what specifications differences there are between
PRO and a non-PRO Tokina AT-X. I've seen the SD designation on both
the PRO and the Non-Pro.
In any event, a lot of people don't seem to get the difference between
$Subj.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09/13/Tamron-SP-70-200mm-F2-8-Di-VC-USD-ultrasonic-focus-motor-and-image-stabilization
It looks like it might be a good lens.
I kind of doubt Pentax would be rebadging that one...
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That reminds me. Sorry to hijack the thread but does anyone have experience
with the Tokina ATX Pro 80-200 f/2.8? I've seen one selling locally and a bit
of googling shows some people moaning about fringing, but I'd trust PDMLers a
bit more than random internet pixel-peepers.
Cheers,
Dave
6 matches
Mail list logo
