Re: Non-Pentax Non-Metz flash

2001-02-09 Thread IronWorks
The long and short of it: I bought the Metz 32-MZ3. Thanks to all in the group for your help in deciding. Maris - Original Message - From: "Jens Bladt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:20 AM Subject: SV: Non-Pentax Non-Metz fl

Re: Non-Pentax Non-Metz flash

2001-02-07 Thread canislupus
At 00:40 5.2.2001 -0600, you wrote: I have seen Pentax and Metz flashes discussed and compared here as well as in the archives and FAQs, but other brands have barely been mentioned. Metz seems to be the favorite. What are your experiences (if any - maybe they're lousy products) with Sigma,

SV: Non-Pentax Non-Metz flash

2001-02-05 Thread Jens Bladt
Hi Think I have been writing about Metz flashes more than once. I don't think other brands are lousy at all! I just find Metz flashes to be very, very good. My oldest, which I bought in 1981, still works like the first day. The original Pentax flashes is extreemly well made too. It's a joy just

Re: Non-Pentax Non-Metz flash

2001-02-05 Thread Mark Cassino
I use a Sunpack MZ440AF and it works fine with the newer bodies (is a digital flash.) It's a basic TTL unit - manual zoom, TTL auto flash only. I also have a Vivitar 283. Nice unit - non-dedicated, manual and non-TTL auto, 4 manual settings, 4 auto settings. I also keep a small Fujica

Non-Pentax Non-Metz flash

2001-02-04 Thread IronWorks
I have seen Pentax and Metz flashes discussed and compared here as well as in the archives and FAQs, but other brands have barely been mentioned. Metz seems to be the favorite. What are your experiences (if any - maybe they're lousy products) with Sigma, Sunpak and Vivitar? Maris - This