has anyone seen this? Here's url:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/productFeatures/pictures.s
html?
This is just plain manipulative IMHO. Show someone an underexposed photo, and
then one properly exposed. For anyone who can spell ISO and knows the
difference between 100 and
Well, for people with PS cameras, this stuff does hold true, though most
PS, except really cheap ones, should be able to expose #1 correctly
independent of film speed. On #2 most PS cameras would fire the flash to
keep the shutter high enough to avoid shake. #3 is just plain silly, as I
don't
2 matches
Mail list logo
