Re: OT: NFQ

2006-01-24 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per the current thread, http://www.alienskin.com You mean "the kodachrome 25" thread. I'd not been reading that one. Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing, but calling it "near film quality" indicates once agai

Re: OT: NFQ

2006-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Godfrey DiGiorgi Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:28:35 -0800 >I have no idea what "adding skins to make digital images look like film" means. >Can you explain? Per the current thread, http://www.alienskin.com >Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing, but calling it >"near film qu

Re: OT: NFQ

2006-01-24 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I have no idea what "adding skins to make digital images look like film" means. Can you explain? Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing, but calling it "near film quality" indicates once again an evident prejudice. Godfrey On Jan 24, 2006, at 5:55 AM, [EMAIL PROT

OT: NFQ

2006-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repeating history all over again ... Adding skins to make digital images look like film. What shall we call it? Does that make it "Near Film Quality"? Now where's my Nagaoka? Collin mail2web - Check your email from the web at