On Jan 24, 2006, at 9:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per the current thread, http://www.alienskin.com
You mean "the kodachrome 25" thread. I'd not been reading that one.
Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing,
but calling it
"near film quality" indicates once agai
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:28:35 -0800
>I have no idea what "adding skins to make digital images look like film"
means.
>Can you explain?
Per the current thread, http://www.alienskin.com
>Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing, but
calling it
>"near film qu
I have no idea what "adding skins to make digital images look like
film" means. Can you explain?
Simulating film textures and such in digital images is amuzing, but
calling it "near film quality" indicates once again an evident
prejudice.
Godfrey
On Jan 24, 2006, at 5:55 AM, [EMAIL PROT
Repeating history all over again ...
Adding skins to make digital images look like film.
What shall we call it?
Does that make it "Near Film Quality"?
Now where's my Nagaoka?
Collin
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
4 matches
Mail list logo