Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-04 Thread Mike Hamilton
I found that my local camera store (McBain Camera) is ordering the last 23 Panasonic L1 camera/lens kits available in Canada, and is selling them for $800. I'm picking one up when they arrive. I tried one out in-store today, and really liked how it felt in my hands. The lens was a

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-03 Thread P. J. Alling
P. J. Alling wrote: Mike Hamilton wrote: Hey all, I've been interested in the Panasonic L1 since it was released, and I'm now considering purchasing one for $400 (without the legendary Leica kit lens). What are the limitations of using K-mount lenses on this body? The

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-03 Thread P. J. Alling
Mike Hamilton wrote: Hey all, I've been interested in the Panasonic L1 since it was released, and I'm now considering purchasing one for $400 (without the legendary Leica kit lens). What are the limitations of using K-mount lenses on this body? The same as using a Pre A lens on

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-03 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 3-Jun-08, at 4:24 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: If you're looking for a smaller lighter backup camera and want to use the same lenses as your K20D I'd suggest the K200D, (that is if you really need 10mp). The L1 uses in lens image stabilization and doesn't support sensor image stablization,

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-03 Thread Mike Hamilton
On 2-Jun-08, at 11:56 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: I've been using the L1 since May 2007. It has become my favorite DSLR body, regardless of what lens I put on it. It's not perfect, the K10D outperforms it in several ways, but there's something truly different and delightful about it. I didn't

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:24 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: The same as using a Pre A lens on any Pentax Digital mount body. No, it's the same as using an M42 thread mount lens. pre-A series lenses on Pentax DSLRs have auto-iris operation but no Av mode with aperture control. You could look into

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread pnstenquist
Wouldn't seem to make much sense if you had to use K lenses. You'd be better off with a camera that could fully utilize your lenses. If you can get the Leica lens, that's a different story. Paul -- Original message -- From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey

OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
Hey all, I've been interested in the Panasonic L1 since it was released, and I'm now considering purchasing one for $400 (without the legendary Leica kit lens). What are the limitations of using K-mount lenses on this body? As far as I'm aware, they need an aperture ring (so my

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread pnstenquist
We want to save you money. If you're doing serious work, you want cameras that match. For $400 you can probably get a second K10D. Paul -- Original message -- From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ah, jeez. You and Paul just want me to spend money... :) But

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread Mike Hamilton
Ah, jeez. You and Paul just want me to spend money... :) But really, I was leaning that way after I wrote my initial message. I really look forward to that lens, and the configuration of the controls. Mike On 2-Jun-08, at 10:15 PM, Adam Maas wrote: I wouldn't bother with it without the

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread Adam Maas
I wouldn't bother with it without the 14-50. You'd do better to buy a DS instead for similar money, or spend a bit more on a used Oly E-510 with in-body IS. With the Leica 14-50 is another thing, the lens makes the kit. -Adam On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: Panasonic L1

2008-06-02 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I've been using the L1 since May 2007. It has become my favorite DSLR body, regardless of what lens I put on it. It's not perfect, the K10D outperforms it in several ways, but there's something truly different and delightful about it. I didn't know at all whether it was worth it when I