"Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 1:01 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
> > K-Mounters is even better.
> >
> > Debra Wilborn wrote:
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > Hmm, I'm definately liking "K-Mounties". I need to
> > > find a red coat and a horse.
> >
02 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> K-Mounters is even better.
>
> Debra Wilborn wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > Hmm, I'm definately liking "K-Mounties". I need to
> > find a red coat and a horse.
>
Don't set the kid off.
Gawd, even Cassleberry was moved to correct him,
and THAT didn't work either.
I think BD's gonna work out once he tames his
typing fingers and figures out he is the new kid
on the block, but for NOW
frank theriault wrote:
>
> sexist comment. not funny
I do too, but when I meet one, she backs off and snorts.
I really should take a bath more than once a week.
Grin.
-Lon
Treena Harp wrote:
>
> I prefer 'Pentaxettes' ...
LOL. Now to all you newbies, lissen up: You do NOT need big
negs. The cameras are clunky, overgrown, and expensive.
Buy a Minox and be happy.
-"Bubba" (not "Brother") Lon
William Robb wrote:
>
> Some of us have already defined this.
>
> Brother William
K-Mounters is even better.
Debra Wilborn wrote:
> (snip)
>
> Hmm, I'm definately liking "K-Mounties". I need to
> find a red coat and a horse.
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dan Scott
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
>
>
> > Pucker-uppers.
>
> You seem awful casual for a Texan.
>
> WW
>
Yee-Haw.
Deb
>
__
--- Feroze Kistan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frits Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
&g
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 10:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
Do they work all day, and sleep all night?
William Robb
And thank gawd fer that. They never stop yodelin' while they're awake,
but they don't know any good tunes (dress a little peckuliar at times,
too...)
;-)
Dan Scott
Ala
--- Treena Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer 'Pentaxettes' ...
>
Girl Power!
Deb in TX
__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
2002 03:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: What we call ourselves.
Thanks for the laugh, Shaun!
Deb the TackyMarshian
--- Shaun Canning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Takumarshians?
>
> Shaun Canning
> PhD Student
> Archaeology Department
> La Trobe University, Bun
one: 0414-967 644
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Chan [mailto:wlachan@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2002 12:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
> SMCists?
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> >I
We can call each other "sadomasochists" for short.
--- Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SMCists?
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> >I like "Pentaxistes" better than Pentaxians. I saw
> this in another
> >thread.
>
>
>
_
> Get fa
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> Well sure they do, but there's a catch-and-release program
that turns
> 'em loose back where they come from (somewhere's in Canada, I
think.
> They're very polite critters, at
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 05:37 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
Pucker-uppers.
You seem awful casual for a Texan.
WW
(ssst...don't tell anyone, but I'm a transplanted Alaskan living under
Norm?
Does that mean he hasn't escaped?
jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:59 PM
Subject: RE: OT: What we call ourselves.
> Just got off the phone.
From: "Frits Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do we need to include every user group in the name?
Maybe there's a need for other subgroups too?
-Screwmount subgroup
-Optio subgroup
-645...
-Auto 110
-APS (ops.)
h...
Jostein
I have it: Pentaxianado
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just got off the phone. Don't worry, there's a Pentax guy there weaving a DSLR.
> -Original Message-
> From: Norm Baugher [mailto:nbaugher@;earthlink.net]
>
> Bruce, call your hospital, ask if there is anyone in your room, if
> there's not, you've escaped.
>
>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Frits [iso-8859-1] Wüthrich wrote:
> K-mounties creates another class next to the brotherhood, so it doesn't
> address all Pentax users. Do we need to include every user group in the name?
> How do we call the users of those endoscopes?
I like K mounties, and the screwheads, bu
Bruce, call your hospital, ask if there is anyone in your room, if
there's not, you've escaped.
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
Is that why everyone in my family has told me that UPS drivers now wear white coats?
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher [mailto:nbaugher@;earthlink.ne
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> > How do we call the users of those endoscopes?
>
> K-Brownies?
FoundViewers?
WW
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> > Hmm, I'm definately liking "K-Mounties". I need to
> > find a red coat and a horse.
It was years before I found out that GRC didn't mean "Grid Road
Cop"
William Robb
Reason enough to switch brands.
> -Original Message-
> From: Feroze Kistan [mailto:angelart@;telkomsa.net]
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frits Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "Frits Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> K-mounties creates another class next to the brotherhood, so it doesn't
> addres
Is that why everyone in my family has told me that UPS drivers now wear white coats?
> -Original Message-
> From: Norm Baugher [mailto:nbaugher@;earthlink.net]
>
> Committed.
>
> Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
>
> >Out patient
>
K-mounties creates another class next to the brotherhood, so it doesn't
address all Pentax users. Do we need to include every user group in the name?
How do we call the users of those endoscopes?
Frits Wüthrich, also not in Canada at the moment
On Sunday 03 November 2002 23:21, Debra Wilborn w
Committed.
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
Out patient
-Original Message-
From: Pentax Guy [mailto:pentax.guy@;rogers.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
Now that's just going way too far. Silly. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: OT: What we call ourselves.
> Out patient
Lemme guess, your an out patient from a mental institution?
EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OT: What we call ourselves.
Out patient
> -Original Message-
> From: Pentax Guy [mailto:pentax.guy@;rogers.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call our
Out patient
> -Original Message-
> From: Pentax Guy [mailto:pentax.guy@;rogers.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
>
> Now that's just going way too far. Silly. ;-)
>
>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Paul Eriksson wrote:
> Funny, that's exactly what my wife call us :-)
Now, we need Wendy back to let us know if its universal, and her husband
refers to us as the same.. now that we know The Look is not gender
specific. :)
--
http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun
Funny, that's exactly what my wife call us :-)
Anyways, teh short answer is it doesn't matter what we call ourselves,
however, my girlfriend has a name for me and everyone else on this list:
"You camera dorks."
It works, and its descriptive!
My friends call me an idiot when they learn how much I spend on camera
stuff, so, I'm 'hey idiot' ;-)
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "gfen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: OT: What we c
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Treena Harp wrote:
> I prefer 'Pentaxettes' ...
So do I... Oh, wait, that's not what you meant.
Anyways, teh short answer is it doesn't matter what we call ourselves,
however, my girlfriend has a name for me and everyone else on this list:
"You camera dorks."
It works, and it
Wow, just back from never leaving and you're trying to start with me?
My last words on this topic. To anyone.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:02 AM
Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> Actually, I wasn't joking. I would have put a smiley or a after my
comment
> if
sexist comment. not funny
Pentax Guy wrote:
> That would be our cheerleader section.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 10:04 PM
> Subject: Re:
That would be our cheerleader section.
- Original Message -
From: "Treena Harp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
> I prefer 'Pentaxettes' ...
I prefer 'Pentaxettes' ...
- Original Message -
From: "Arathi-Sridhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
>
> how about "pentax guys" o
how about "pentax guys" or "pentax fellas" (if Pentaxite is
vetoed...)
-Sridhar
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: OT: What we call
DSLRlessians? ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Shaun Canning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: OT: What we call ourselves.
> Takumarshians?
>
> Shaun Canning
> PhD Student
> Archaeo
]
Subject: Re: OT: What we call ourselves.
SMCists?
regards,
Alan Chan
>I like "Pentaxistes" better than Pentaxians. I saw this in another
>thread.
_
Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access!
http://resour
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 08:15 AM, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I like "Pentaxistes" better than Pentaxians. I saw this in another
thread.
Steven Desjardins
Hi Steve,
I like Pentaxians better than Pentaxistes (although sometimes, due to
excessively "testie" behavior, "Penticles" seem
44 matches
Mail list logo
