Re: OT: You are not a photographer

2012-02-03 Thread Doug Franklin
On 2012-02-03 12:28, Larry Colen wrote: Nope, most people these days seem to hold their camera from both edges of the body, elbows out to either side and flopping in the breeze, that is when they aren't holding them at arm's length using live view. Trying to hand hold pretty much anything

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-06 Thread Lister
Someone should her that removing the photographers name and publishing the photographs is illegal in some parts of the world. .-) Apart from that I see her point, but don´t agree with her all the time. DagT Den 5. okt. 2011 kl. 00:09 skrev Charles Robinson: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread frank theriault
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography.  As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer. Can be fun, can be painful.  Worth a peek, I

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread P. J. Alling
On 10/5/2011 4:25 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinsoncharl...@visi.com wrote: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer.

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread frank theriault
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, come on Frank.  I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least twice the snark applied. You're right. I guess I was referring not so much to the actual comments about the photographers and their work

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread Charles Robinson
On Oct 5, 2011, at 15:54, frank theriault wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least twice the snark applied. You're right. I guess I was referring not so much to the

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread P. J. Alling
True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work may be, it's not as bad as that. On 10/5/2011 4:54 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread Charles Robinson
On Oct 5, 2011, at 16:11, P. J. Alling wrote: True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work may be, it's not as bad as that. That's kind of how I approached it. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread Bran Everseeking
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:51:16 -0500 Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work may be, it's not as bad as that. That's kind of how I approached it. -Charles Mine may be but at least i don't add bad photoshop to snaps

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread Larry Colen
On 10/5/2011 1:25 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinsoncharl...@visi.com wrote: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer.

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-05 Thread John Sessoms
From: Charles Robinson On Oct 5, 2011, at 15:54, frank theriault wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least twice the snark applied. You're right. I guess I was referring

OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-04 Thread Charles Robinson
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer. Can be fun, can be painful. Worth a peek, I think! http://youarenotaphotog.tumblr.com/ -Charles -- Charles Robinson

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-04 Thread Bruce Walker
On 11-10-04 6:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer. Can be fun, can be painful. Worth a peek, I think!

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-04 Thread Paul Sorenson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=d-hxBkca5l4 -p On 10/4/2011 5:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote: A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a photographer. Can

Re: OT: You are NOT a Photographer

2011-10-04 Thread Keith Mosier
Durn!  And all these years I thought you had to work at it.  I think my ratio of good to snapshot is 1:200.    The youtube ad for the Panasonic is hilarious in ways the creaters did not intend.   k -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net