On 2012-02-03 12:28, Larry Colen wrote:
Nope, most people these days seem to hold their camera from both edges of the
body, elbows out to either side and flopping in the breeze, that is when they
aren't holding them at arm's length using live view.
Trying to hand hold pretty much anything
Someone should her that removing the photographers name and publishing the
photographs is illegal in some parts of the world. .-)
Apart from that I see her point, but don´t agree with her all the time.
DagT
Den 5. okt. 2011 kl. 00:09 skrev Charles Robinson:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some
people consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider
herself to be a photographer.
Can be fun, can be painful. Worth a peek, I
On 10/5/2011 4:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinsoncharl...@visi.com wrote:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider
photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a
photographer.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least
twice the snark applied.
You're right. I guess I was referring not so much to the actual
comments about the photographers and their work
On Oct 5, 2011, at 15:54, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least
twice the snark applied.
You're right. I guess I was referring not so much to the
True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work may
be, it's not as bad as that.
On 10/5/2011 4:54 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve
On Oct 5, 2011, at 16:11, P. J. Alling wrote:
True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work may be,
it's not as bad as that.
That's kind of how I approached it.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:51:16 -0500
Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
True, but I look at as insperation, that no matter how bad my work
may be, it's not as bad as that.
That's kind of how I approached it.
-Charles
Mine may be but at least i don't add bad photoshop to snaps
On 10/5/2011 1:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Charles Robinsoncharl...@visi.com wrote:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider
photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a
photographer.
From: Charles Robinson
On Oct 5, 2011, at 15:54, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, come on Frank. I didn't see anything there that didn't deserve at least
twice the snark applied.
You're right. I guess I was referring
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people
consider photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a
photographer.
Can be fun, can be painful. Worth a peek, I think!
http://youarenotaphotog.tumblr.com/
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
On 11-10-04 6:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider
photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a
photographer.
Can be fun, can be painful. Worth a peek, I think!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=d-hxBkca5l4
-p
On 10/4/2011 5:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
A sometimes-hilarious look (with a lot of biting criticism) at what some people consider
photography. As viewed by someone who DOES consider herself to be a
photographer.
Can
Durn! And all these years I thought you had to work at it. I think my ratio
of good to snapshot is 1:200.
The youtube ad for the Panasonic is hilarious in ways the creaters did not
intend.
k
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
15 matches
Mail list logo