Joseph Tainter a écrit:
For this class of lens it is quite sharp plus a lot of fun. I have
enjoyed mine much. It is sharper than Pentax's F 17-28 fisheys.
A mine friend has a Zenitar (for Nikon), and I have a K 4/17mm fish eye.
Both seems near similar quality.
Michel
For this class of lens it is quite sharp plus a lot of fun. I have
enjoyed mine much. It is sharper than Pentax's F 17-28 fisheys.
JOe
Hi Marnie,
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 01:12:49 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). [...]
Complete waste of time or not?
I have one and I've been very happy with the prints I get from it. It
does have a lot of distortion, but it's a fisheye so I
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm).
Complete waste of time or not?
Hi,
I have owned the Zenitar (K-mount) and it's a good lens for the money,
if you are able to get it for a good price, of course, and get one
that has a good build quality.
However, the lens is a very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been think about getting a Zenitar fish eye (16mm). Screwmount, it would
work on my Canon Elan 7e (with the adapter that I already got for the Super
Tak 35mm 3.5). Evidentially higher priced/better fish eyes have a lot less
distortion, etc., etc.
But it might
5 matches
Mail list logo
