Bruce Walker wrote:
>"Photographers across the country can breathe a sigh of relief. The
>U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York dismissed
>collector Jonathan Sobels lawsuit against photographer William
>Eggleston. The case, art law experts say, has broader implications for
>all
I think it is really funny the court case happens to be about an
Eggleston. If it was an Adams or Weston print, sold as fine art limited
edition vintage prints, then possibly I'd have some sympathy if a bunch
of them turned up in the market from the same printer.
Eggleston work just begs to
I agree with you Brian. Selling limited editions of a work, in this
case a print, implies one won't produce and sell 'similar' limited
editions. Allowing it on the technicality of how the print was
produced seems wrong, largely because the collector (at least if it
was me) isn't buying it for how i
Quoting Bruce Walker :
"Photographers across the country can breathe a sigh of relief. The
U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York dismissed
collector Jonathan Sobel’s lawsuit against photographer William
Eggleston. The case, art law experts say, has broader implications for
all
"Photographers across the country can breathe a sigh of relief. The
U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York dismissed
collector Jonathan Sobel’s lawsuit against photographer William
Eggleston. The case, art law experts say, has broader implications for
all artists who incorporate o
5 matches
Mail list logo
