> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sessoms
>
> I thought "the price of admission is a serpent's tongue and a half-
> concealed stiletto"
>
what a fantastic phrase! I've never heard it before. It sounds positively
Jacobean so what a surprise to find that it's one of Gro
I thought "the price of admission is a serpent's tongue and a
half-concealed stiletto"
From: Darren Addy
Perhaps I have a Condescending Personality Disorder. Wasn't that a
prerequisite to joining?
: )
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Tom C wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Darren Addy
> Perhaps I have a Condescending Personality Disorder. Wasn't that a
> prerequisite to joining?
> : )
If you think being condescending is the correct and proper thing to
do, then by all means keep doing it.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
That would be the new P.D. we've just invented in our midst :-).
Just to make things clear, Darren responded off the list and it seems my
mailer got it wrong in terms of to whom his comment was directed.
I think we're cool now.
On 10/29/2012 8:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Perhaps I have a Conde
Mark!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Perhaps I have a Condescending Personality Disorder. Wasn't that a
> prerequisite to joining?
> : )
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Tom C wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Seriously, if one of yo
Perhaps I have a Condescending Personality Disorder. Wasn't that a
prerequisite to joining?
: )
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>> Seriously, if one of your biggest concerns (that makes you pound your
>>> keyboard) is frettin
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>> Seriously, if one of your biggest concerns (that makes you pound your
>> keyboard) is fretting about which huge corporation is doing business
>> with (or suing) some other huge corporation, then I don't know whether
>> to pity you or to off
Darren, if you were turning to me (which seems to be the case according
to my mail client) then:
1. Living in Israel and being on the brink of the war with just about
every neighbor may be except Jordan I get my set of problems full
enough, thank you.
2. Being non-American (non-British, non-
AMEN
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Seriously, if one of your biggest concerns (that makes you pound your
> keyboard) is fretting about which huge corporation is doing business
> with (or suing) some other huge corporation, then I don't know whether
> to pity you or to off
Reply interspersed.
On 10/25/2012 3:33 AM, Tom C wrote:
From: Boris Liberman
I think that what's moral for individual human beings does not
necessarily apply to corporations. Specifically, I think that the so
called grey area is much broader for corporations than it is for you and me.
In th
Regarding Wal-Mart/Amazon, the same is true of any tablet or PC they sell...
T
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Tom C wrote:
>> but the decision wasn't made; a headline was written and the result is a
>> lesson
>> in how we should be more careful about believing what the media tell us
>
> The
> but the decision wasn't made; a headline was written and the result is a
> lesson
> in how we should be more careful about believing what the media tell us
The truth may lie somewhere in between, who knows? Even this article,
that ostensibly corrects the original story with Samsung denying the
on 2012-10-23 22:40 Boris Liberman wrote
Well, no. In fact, there is nothing immoral in stopping dealing with Apple.
Like it is always said - "nothing personal, just business"... Someone up the
ladder came up with the power point presentation that appears to support the
idea that in terms of prof
> From: Boris Liberman
>
> I think that what's moral for individual human beings does not
> necessarily apply to corporations. Specifically, I think that the so
> called grey area is much broader for corporations than it is for you and me.
>
In theory that's correct. In practice it's wrong. I kno
On 10/24/2012 6:19 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer to your question is that corporations are amoral beings.
Note: I'm not saying they are evil, and I am not saying that some
corporations aren't run by very moral and good executives.
I think that what's moral for individual human
it? This is a simple ongoing commodity transaction that is completely
> divorced from the intellectual property departments duking it out.
>
> Life goes on...
>
> Cheers,
> frank
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: Tom C
> Sent: October 22, 2012 10/22/12
> To
action that is completely
divorced from the intellectual property departments duking it out.
Life goes on...
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Tom C
Sent: October 22, 2012 10/22/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: OT - Samsung Reportedly Will Stop Sourcing Apple
It'
on 2012-10-22 11:22 Tom C wrote
It's what I thought would happen. Why would a company want to sell
components to a competitor that tries to rip them off for $1B in
court?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57537137-37/samsung-kicking-apple-to-curb-for-lcd-panels-report-says/
this report is deni
18 matches
Mail list logo
