Airbus A380 test bed pics
Can anybody say DC-3 grin?
Yes. S-A-D-I-S-T !!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 12/8/05, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just compare that with my longest recent flight, 13 hours from Hong Kong to
London, crammed into a seat two inches too narrow and six inches too short
for a six-footer - how on earth do you get on with airline seats?
They stick him in the cargo
If I were worried about safety, I would rather take the QE2 across the
Atlantic than a plane.
John
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:55:22 -, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
I firmly beleive they should be limited to 25 passengers. That way they
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My gosh, what a monster. I can't imagine how miserable it will be at Heathrow
on a morning when three of those arrive at the same time.
Believe me Godfrey, I was there yesterday with no 747s on sight. It
was still grim, miserable and user
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe me Godfrey, I was there yesterday with no 747s on sight. It
was still grim, miserable and user unfriendly. I only fly Heathrow
when there is no alternative.
Most airports are miserable and unfriendly. Would
On 12/7/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was a joke.
So was the wow.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
That was a joke.
So was the wow.
Yeah but you got suckered - it's reall 5,203 bicycles
;-P
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 8/12/05, John Coyle, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just compare that with my longest recent flight, 13 hours from Hong Kong to
London, crammed into a seat two inches too narrow and six inches too short
for a six-footer - how on earth do you get on with airline seats?
Arrive early at check in,
On 12/8/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was a joke.
So was the wow.
Yeah but you got suckered - it's reall 5,203 bicycles
Wow!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aw, c'mon Cotty, I took my first ever flight in a DC3, and the thing
rattled and banged it's way across the Channel at a good 75 mph! Got us
there though, and in reasonable comfort.
Of course you jumped out of it just after
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Jostein wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe me Godfrey, I was there yesterday with no 747s on sight. It was
still grim, miserable and user unfriendly. I only fly Heathrow when there
is no alternative.
Most airports are miserable and unfriendly. Would you prefer Gatwick or
C'mon Christian, I'm not that old!
Although I do feel it sometimes
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: OT Airbus A380 test bed pics
- Original
Airbus A380 test bed pics
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe me Godfrey, I was there yesterday with no 747s on sight. It
was still grim, miserable and user unfriendly. I only fly Heathrow
when there is no alternative.
Most airports
The best airport is the nearest.
John
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:30:35 -, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message - From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Believe me Godfrey, I was there yesterday with no 747s on sight. It was
still grim, miserable and user
On 12/8/05, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best airport is the nearest.
The best airport is the one you're leaving from.
Reminds me of the old Henny Youngman joke:
Just came back from a pleasure trip;
Drove my mother-in-law to the airport rimshot.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Dec 8, 2005, at 8:41 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Per kilometer, yes. Per trip, no.
That's the good thing about statistics. You can draw whatever
conclusion you like based on how you interpret the data :)
- Dave
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/07 Wed AM 02:50:24 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT Airbus A380 test bed pics
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
http://samchuiphotos.com/A380Sydney/A380_Australia_visit_November_2005.html
Thanks
Very interesting. He got a bit carried away with the wide angle. I wanted
an exterior shot which showed the scale of the aircraft. Normal lens shot
of the whole plane with people near the engines or wheels.
Powell
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
On 12/6/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
http://samchuiphotos.com/A380Sydney/A380_Australia_visit_November_2005.html
That is one Big Mother of an Airplane!!!
I recall hearing the figure early in the planning stages, but I've
On 7/12/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
How many will it hold?
3,752.
Bicycles.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
In maximum seating configuration, as many as 800 people.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:47:23PM -0500, frank theriault wrote:
On 12/6/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
On 12/7/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
How many will it hold?
3,752.
Bicycles.
Wow...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 12/7/05, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In maximum seating configuration, as many as 800 people.
Wow...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
http://samchuiphotos.com/A380Sydney/
A380_Australia_visit_November_2005.html
My gosh, what a monster. I can't imagine how miserable it will be at
Heathrow on a morning when three of those arrive at the same time.
The last time that
Deplane time1 to 2 hours.
Norm
John Francis wrote:
In maximum seating configuration, as many as 800 people.
Actually, that's a serious problem. You can't board that many
people through a single jetway, so the plane is designed for
multiple simultaneous board points. Even there, though, most
airports just can't handle that many people at a single gate.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 12:11:15PM -0800,
Think of the Air Disaster Headlines that would be possible, like the
Titanic...
John Francis wrote:
In maximum seating configuration, as many as 800 people.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:47:23PM -0500, frank theriault wrote:
On 12/6/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my
Airports will have to be redesigned, the only way to unload one of those
monsters in a relatively reasonable amount of time is with a double
decker concourse, which few, (read no), airports have at this time.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
Airbus sunk by iceberg?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 December 2005 21:29
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Airbus A380 test bed pics
Think of the Air Disaster Headlines that would be possible,
like
: OT Airbus A380 test bed pics
Think of the Air Disaster Headlines that would be possible,
like the Titanic...
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: OT Airbus A380 test bed pics
Actually, that's a serious problem. You can't board that many
people through a single jetway, so the plane is designed for
multiple simultaneous board points. Even there, though, most
airports just
On 7 Dec 2005 at 15:59, William Robb wrote:
Multiple gates?
Not that airlines or airports ever really show much concern about little
things like not annoying their customers.
There is AU$100mil being spent on the Sydney airport infrastructure including
terminals in order to properly
On 7 Dec 2005 at 10:25, Powell Hargrave wrote:
Very interesting. He got a bit carried away with the wide angle. I wanted an
exterior shot which showed the scale of the aircraft. Normal lens shot of the
whole plane with people near the engines or wheels.
I'm pretty sure he would have shot
3,752.
Bicycles.
Wow...
That was a joke.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 7/12/05, Norman Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Deplane time1 to 2 hours.
Talking bollocks man!
Source??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty wrote:
3,752.
Bicycles.
Wow...
That was a joke.
3,752 bicycles in an Airbus sounds like a song title.
It is designed for the current antiterrorist evironment. It will take 4
hours for the passengers to go through security anyway grin.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John Francis wrote:
Actually, that's a serious problem.
I firmly beleive they should be limited to 25 passengers. That way they
can not kill too many when they crash. Probably should be unpressurized,
and limited to about 200kts too.
Can anybody say DC-3 grin?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
On 7/12/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
I firmly beleive they should be limited to 25 passengers. That way they
can not kill too many when they crash. Probably should be unpressurized,
and limited to about 200kts too.
Statistically still the safest form of transport.
Can anybody
Op Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:55:22 +0100 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/12/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
I firmly beleive they should be limited to 25 passengers. That way they
can not kill too many when they crash. Probably should be unpressurized,
and limited to about 200kts
Not my pics but interesting and pretty unique I guess:
http://samchuiphotos.com/A380Sydney/A380_Australia_visit_November_2005.html
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since
41 matches
Mail list logo
