PA I would agree with TIFF as a format if it weren't so loosely followed. You can
PA never be sure if a TIFF saved by one application will be readable by
PA another, in
PA my experience.
The best format for future readability would be plain bitmap, without any compression
(or
just some easy
I've had the pleasure of thinking about digital archiving at work. I work at
a Neurophysiology dept at a hospital and we produce a lot of digital data
and one of our great problems is how to properly archive every test we
perform. The outcome of our intensive thinking :) would be Magneto-optical
Petter Jarbo wrote:
I've had the pleasure of thinking about digital archiving at work. I work
at
a Neurophysiology dept at a hospital and we produce a lot of digital data
and one of our great problems is how to properly archive every test we
perform. The outcome of our intensive thinking :) would
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Patrick White wrote:
My pick is CD-Rs with JPEGs on them. Some CD-Rs are touted at surviving
100 years (?) under ideal storage conditions, so they meet media longevity.
I don't trust such numbers, especially considering CDR has only been
around for what, five years?
At 05:16 PM 1/17/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Patrick White wrote:
My pick is CD-Rs with JPEGs on them. Some CD-Rs are touted at
surviving
100 years (?) under ideal storage conditions, so they meet media longevity.
I don't trust such numbers, especially considering
5 matches
Mail list logo
