.
Regards,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November 2008 19:28
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
Thanks, John. Yes, I noticed that some of t
Hi!
Thanks, John. Yes, I noticed that some of the reviews mentioned that...
I will have another, closer, look.
Boris
John Whittingham wrote:
Hi Boris
The Tamron 17-35 has quite a bit of field curvature resulting in a
lot of images that do not look sharp at the edges. This was something
I fo
it company with my Tamron 28-75 or a bag full of FA
primes.
Regards,
John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2008 11:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-
In fact, to disclose even more details on my pondering, I am thinking
of selling FAJ 18-35 (probably somewhat overdue anyway), a film body
and a 21 ltd (please notice) and buy Tamron 17-35/2.8. Then I'll have
2 Tamron zooms and 4 Pentax full frame primes - quite enough for me.
Boris
On Wed, Nov 1
Hehe I have an eye on that one as well ;)
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thibouille wrote:
>>
>> Boris, my 16-45 may go at a time or another ... I just dunno yet.
>>
>
> Please let me know when you would know ;-). But many ideas are running
> through m
Thibouille wrote:
Boris, my 16-45 may go at a time or another ... I just dunno yet.
Please let me know when you would know ;-). But many ideas are running
through my head, including, but not limited to, Tamron 17-50/2.8 that
can be had for a very fair price here in Israel brand new.
Boris
Boris, my 16-45 may go at a time or another ... I just dunno yet.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
I'm hoping it's good, because I want one.
B&H photo has a few reviews, seem to be mostly self congratulatory
expressions that the buyer made a good choice.
Boris Lieberman wrote:
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning
it? Or is it the general opinion of th
ot;
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
If you buy from a reputable supplier, there is no risk. B&H replaced
mine without question. What's more, the problem was due to assembly
mistakes in manufacture. I'm sure it's been resolved. (Although pixel
peeping paran
Steve, my very first abroad from Israel was back in September 1994 to
NYC and LA. So you don't have to convince me ;-).
Boris
Steve Desjardins wrote:
NYC is lovely in the fall. ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIB
- Original Message -
From: "PN Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
If you buy from a reputable supplier, there is no risk. B&H replaced mine
without question. What's more, the problem was due to assembly mistakes
in manufacture.
- Original Message -
From: "PN Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
I understand. It's unfortunate that Pentax doesn't have a better presence
in Israel.
It's more unfortunate that Pentax quality control doesn't have a better
en
being
>> sold. I can get a DA 16-45/4 though (for $450) which I probably
will
>> eventually.
>>
>> Boris
>>
>> William Robb wrote:
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
>>> Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wante
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Paul, each time I send a lens to US of A for replacement and each time
I receive one as it passes through our border, I get to pay money.
After two or three replacement transact
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:53:05AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "PN Stenquist"
> Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
>
>
>> I understand. It's unfortunate that Pentax doesn't have a better
>> pre
- Original Message -
From: "PN Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
You have to take everything you read on the other forum with a grain of
salt. I suspect that paranoia sets in the moment one of those guys
purchases the 16-50. I doubt that the p
, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Paul, each time I send a lens to US of A for replacement and each
time
I receive one as it passes through our border, I get to pay money.
After two or three r
y will
eventually.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone
owning
it? Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens
gt;
>> And no, Paul, I am not in position to *risk* my money in getting
>> potentially flawed by production DA* 16-50. Locally it is not even being
>> sold. I can get a DA 16-45/4 though (for $450) which I probably will
>> eventually.
>>
>> Boris
>>
>
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Boris Liberman
>> Sent: Monday, 10 November 2008 1:16 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
>
. Locally it is not even
being sold. I can get a DA 16-45/4 though (for $450) which I
probably will eventually.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion
ber 2008 1:16 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
>
> Hoover like in the namesake dam?
>
>
>
> Hoover as in the company that makes vacuum cleaners.
>
> In other words, machines that suck.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Monday, 10 November 2008 1:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hoover like in the namesake dam?
Hoover as in the company that makes
: "Boris Liberman"
> Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning it?
>> Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens is of insufficient
>> quality? H
Correction to my previous message: found 16-50/2.8 locally. Here it
costs $1,000.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone
-45/4 though (for $450) which I probably will
eventually.
Boris
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning
it? Or is it the gen
So Bill, you are saying it's an extension of the smc-P DA 10-17mm
Fisheye design?
On Nov 9, 2008, at 12:20 , William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant dis
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Opinions about DA 17-70/4 SDM wanted
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning it?
Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens is of
insufficient quality? How about d
Hi!
I don't recall any significant discussion of this lens. Anyone owning
it? Or is it the general opinion of this list, that this lens is of
insufficient quality? How about distortion at 17 mm?
Thanks in advance.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
29 matches
Mail list logo
