Well, not really. They are good as (almost) always is every shot you're
showing.
They fit together and they work for me. And I am somewhat inspired to
try something like this myself, but no promises ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks Boris ... But do you have any other opinions or
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24a.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24b.htm
I like the BW rendering of all three, but the second one, with the
pillar, doesn't match the other
On 5/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24a.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24b.htm
Beautiful work, all three of them - and wonderful as a series...
cheers,
Thanks Boris ... But do you have any other opinions or critique of
them to share?
G
On May 26, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Yep, I think it would work as hmmm a modern triptych ;-).
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24.htm
I put all three beside each other on the screen, the seismograph on
the left, pillar in the middle, the one with the light on the right. I
can't recognise the other objects in that shot, but the central theme
of the other two seems to be earthquakes?
The first thing that struck me was the
Nice pics. It's interesting how you have adapted this style. You seem
to have refined your vision for such things since you first showed us
this type of work.
Paul
On May 26, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Uh huh ... In modern use, the word has come to mean, more generally,
a set
Godfrey posted:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24a.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24b.htm
Great stuff. I really like those. Especially the middle one.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, the middle one is intriguing. The unusual perspective led me to
study it for awhile. The straight horizontals serve to anchor it nicely.
Paul
On May 27, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey posted:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/24.htm
In a message dated 5/26/2007 3:39:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I went to the Cantor Arts Center at Stanford University, yesterday to
see the exhibit that I had seen a documentary movie of last week. It
is an exhibit of Gordon Parks' work, and I must say they
I like these, a lot. You're moving in a minimalist
direction with your work, Godfrey, and it's developing
very nicely.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went to the Cantor Arts Center at Stanford
University, yesterday to
see the exhibit that I had seen a documentary
I went to the Cantor Arts Center at Stanford University, yesterday to
see the exhibit that I had seen a documentary movie of last week. It
is an exhibit of Gordon Parks' work, and I must say they are
stunningly powerful photographs. Well worth it for anyone in the area
who might have an
triptych
noun [C] SPECIALIZED
a piece of art made of three paintings connected to each other in a
way that allows the two outer ones to fold in towards the larger
central one:
A medieval triptych hung above the altar.
On 5/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went to the Cantor
Uh huh ... In modern use, the word has come to mean, more generally,
a set of three images intended to hang together. :-)
G
On May 26, 2007, at 3:40 PM, AlexG wrote:
triptych
noun [C] SPECIALIZED
a piece of art made of three paintings connected to each other in a
way that allows the two
Yep, I think it would work as hmmm a modern triptych ;-).
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Uh huh ... In modern use, the word has come to mean, more generally,
a set of three images intended to hang together. :-)
G
On May 26, 2007, at 3:40 PM, AlexG wrote:
triptych
noun [C]
14 matches
Mail list logo
