Ah yes, the maidenform bra, nightmares of my youth...
David Savage wrote:
On Dec 22, 2007 2:17 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, thats the 50's.:-)
Its the 60's i have trouble with.
I still struggle to get my head around the concept that time goes back
that far
Well.some kind of dreams, anyway...
-p
P. J. Alling wrote:
Ah yes, the maidenform bra, nightmares of my youth...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Thanks Derby and all others who have responded to this post.
Actually, I'm starting to experiment more with deep shadows and
fashion or figure photography. Check out some of the fashion pics in
Vogue and New York Times Style. Some of the top fashion shooters are
using shadows in
On Dec 22, 2007 2:17 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, thats the 50's.:-)
Its the 60's i have trouble with.
I still struggle to get my head around the concept that time goes back
that far (says the bloke who just recently left his 20's)
vbg
Although from what I've seen in
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm lens.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1625224
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
A very nice look!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties
Kodachrome transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that
look. It was actually shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm
lens.
Nice job, Paul. But! Always a but, isn't there. She is most likely a very nice
person but from the photo and her expression I would not want to know her. If
you were trying for the gangster's girlfriend, or prostitute look you
nailed it.
Might make a nice cover for a Private Eye type
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm lens.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1625224
Paul;
That's
Yup, thats the 50's.:-)
Its the 60's i have trouble with.
Dave
On Dec 21, 2007 10:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160
On Dec 21, 2007 10:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm lens.
In a message dated 12/21/2007 8:08:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm
I, too, think it's a wonderful photo. I'm not fond of the chair,
perhaps an old chrome framed diner chair might work better.
I have to strongly disagree with Graywolf. I'd like to get know her.
Very much. g
Isn't your model the young lady you found tending to a window display
some time
I take it back, about the chair. It adds a certain grittiness to the
photograph. The more I look at it, the more I think you could
completely change the mood by changing only the chair. The one in the
photo lends to a smoky, crass environment. Perhaps the back room of a
road house or a
Paul, I am not old enough to *remember* the 50ies as they were. But I
sure like what I see.
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on
Thanks for looking. To tell you the truth, I don't remember what I did here.
Certainly no air brush, but perhaps some gaussian blur. I did make an effort to
reduce the visible detail overall.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated
Thanks Tom. She was actually somewhat cold and troubled. She appeared to be the
owner of an expensive clothing store in upscale Birmingham, so when I asked her
if she wanted to model I assumed she was much older than she really was. Turned
out, she was only 19. She had grown up in Toledo, Ohio
Good memory. Yes, that's her. She of the incredibly tiny waist. I met her when
I shot her through the doorway with my Leica. The red dress pic was seen here
before as well, but it was a lousy rendering of a bad scan. Still not a great
scan. Someday I have to get a film scanner and redo some of
Yes it has the look, though maybe a bit earlier, late 40's maybe.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded fifties Kodachrome
transparency. At least it's my interpretation of that look. It was actually
shot on Portra NC 160 with the 6x7 and 105mm
Paul,
It's a nice retro-looking photo.
(Maybe not so retro-looking model - I suspect the hair style was
different back then. - Bingo, that's what in this picture was not quite
50-60s for me.)
There is a strange thing that bothers me a little bit.
Some areas of the skin look a bit bleached
Nineteen and s cynical looking. The world is a sad place.
Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Tom. She was actually somewhat
In a message dated 12/21/2007 3:16:09 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nineteen and s cynical looking. The world is a sad place.
Graywolf
=
Yeah, I don't care for her expression either, but think Paul was going for a
look.
Marnie aka Doe
Well done - rather a unique look - does sort of look like a scanned
chrome rather than negative. I like it.
--
Bruce
Friday, December 21, 2007, 7:45:03 AM, you wrote:
pcn I redid this pic to give it the look of a slightly faded
pcn fifties Kodachrome transparency. At least it's my
Thanks Bruce. Had some fun with this. I'm revisiting some of my MF
scans. Posting another Dana pic soon.
Paul
On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well done - rather a unique look - does sort of look like a scanned
chrome rather than negative. I like it.
--
Bruce
Friday,
Good shot and even more interesting story.
At first the shadow bothered me a bit, but then thinking 'noir', it
probably works well that way.
D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Tom. She was actually somewhat cold and troubled. She appeared to be
the owner of an expensive clothing store in
24 matches
Mail list logo
