Re: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-10 Thread mike wilson
I suspect the bokeh here is more a function of the background than the lens. From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/05/10 Wed AM 12:24:59 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) Blaaah Tim Mostly harmless

Re: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-10 Thread mike wilson
Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. mai 2006 02:25 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) Blaaah Tim Mostly harmless (just

Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-10 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 5/8/2006 4:10:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've enabled myself with another crappy lens. A Tamron 300/2,8 adaptall. Ok, it is not crappy, but it is old, and has a lot off what the seller called patina. What's really nice is that it balances perfectly

Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-09 Thread mike wilson
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/05/08 Mon PM 11:09:05 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) I've enabled myself with another crappy lens. A Tamron 300/2,8 adaptall. Ok, it is not crappy, but it is old

RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-09 Thread Tim Øsleby
of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9. mai 2006 09:45 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement

RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-09 Thread Tim Øsleby
Subject: Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) Nice pic, though I sure wish the bokeh was more like Pentax's! Tim Øsleby wrote: I've enabled myself with another crappy lens. A Tamron 300/2,8 adaptall. Ok, it is not crappy, but it is old, and has a lot

RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-09 Thread Tim Øsleby
other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. mai 2006 02:25 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) Blaaah Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never

Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-09 Thread Paul Stenquist
clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10. mai 2006 02:25 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement) Blaaah Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power

PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-08 Thread Tim Øsleby
I've enabled myself with another crappy lens. A Tamron 300/2,8 adaptall. Ok, it is not crappy, but it is old, and has a lot off what the seller called patina. What's really nice is that it balances perfectly with the DS when using the AF converter. It’s a fast lens, so the auto focus is speedy. I

Re: PESO: Common Redshank minding it's own business (new enablement)

2006-05-08 Thread Gonz
Nice pic, though I sure wish the bokeh was more like Pentax's! Tim Øsleby wrote: I've enabled myself with another crappy lens. A Tamron 300/2,8 adaptall. Ok, it is not crappy, but it is old, and has a lot off what the seller called patina. What's really nice is that it balances perfectly with