Beautiful scene. I like how you framed that waterfall and used
foreground elements to convey the sense of it being hidden. Very nice!
Mark
On 2/20/2013 4:02 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Comments an
t: February 20, 2013 2/20/13
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: PESO: Hidden Waterfall
>
> One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
> Comments and criticisms are always welcome.
> Dan Matyola
> h
That's beautiful, Dan!
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Sent: February 20, 2013 2/20/13
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: PESO: Hidden Waterfall
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo
Thanks, Aahz!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>
>> One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
>
> Nice fram
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Nice framing!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*
Yes, there are a number of nice waterfalls on the way to Hana, then
even nicer ones in the National Park, that can be reached by walking
30-45 minutes. Some of the best ones require a much longer hike,
however, but unfortunately I didn't have the time for that this time
around.
Dan Matyola
http:/
one of the things that make it worthwhile, clearly :-)
ann
On 2/20/2013 16:02, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Comments and criticisms are always welcome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/dani
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:08:51 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
> Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
As far as I know. That's what makes it harder to get a "normal
looking" photo from them. You have to crop out a _tiny_ portion of the
center of the shot. :-)
Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:14:23 -0400
Subj
Just wanted to throw in that it's easier to mask the "fisheye-ness" of
longer focal length fisheyes than shorter focal length ones. That is,
it'll be easier to take a "normal looking" shot with a 16mm FE than an
8mm FE.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:48:23 -0400, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to post this anyway, careful subject choice will minimize
> how noticeable the fisheye effect is.
> Here's an example which I think does just that.
>
> http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_hidden_wa
I was going to post this anyway, careful subject choice will minimize
how noticeable the fisheye effect is.
Here's an example which I think does just that.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_hidden_waterfall.html
(If others don't think that well they can just complain as usual :-P ).
Da
12 matches
Mail list logo
