Thanks Boris. The height is just right for me so that I can view it
without scrolling, on my macbook. Maybe I will have to go to the
small/large method... but that won't be for a while.
Russ
On 4/13/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russel, there you go:
1) good, very good
2) not
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/13 Fri AM 12:41:10 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - A Chilly Afternoon
In a message dated 4/12/2007 2:17:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK Thanks Bill
Russel, there you go:
1) good, very good
2) not big enough
3) bright enough for me.
Boris
Russell Kerstetter wrote:
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well as constructive
Interesting idea, well captured, but the overall image just isn't
gripping enough. It might be better bigger.
Russell Kerstetter wrote:
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as
It is big enough and bright enough for me. I think there is too much
sky that has nothing in it. So I would crop it a bit differently.
Take most of it off and go for a more square shot. With that kind of
crop, I think it would be a pretty good photo.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 11, 2007,
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
that on purpose because, Rick you are correct, I was wanting it to be
moody and dreary. However, I guess I went too far :) Here is a
different take on it:
I think that's definitely a stronger photo. The square crop suits it
well, the larger size and tonal edits make it more than the prior
rendering. Good job!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
Yes, this looks much better - I don't think you lost the feel you were
trying to convey.
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
RK Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
RK
In a message dated 4/12/2007 2:17:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
RK Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
RK that
I'm going to be a contrary old cuss and say that I
liked the original better! With this crop, the
building distracts from the mood.
Rick
--- Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and
Bruce for your input.
Several of you commented that it is
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - A Chilly Afternoon
- Original Message -
From: Russell Kerstetter
Subject: PESO
Thanks. This is actually the first crop I tried, but I decided that I
wanted more sky and water. I do like the square, but I find myself
looking up at the sky, and there is nothing there. Maybe I will have
to print them and then we will see... Thanks for your input.
Russ
On 4/12/07, Godfrey
Thanks Bruce for your response, that is encouraging to me as I learn.
I think my pictures sometimes lack a 'soul', so what I have been
trying to do lately is really think about the feeling I want to
capture instead of snapping away and then trying to clean up a mess
later.
Russ
On 4/12/07, Bruce
Thanks Marnie,
I one thing I struggled with in this was the contrast, I felt that too
much gave it too much 'oomph' to let it still be moody, and I guess
that too much 'do nothing sky' makes it just blah. Thanks for your
input.
Russ
On 4/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a
Rick
I am not sure which crop I prefer, I like the square, but I keep
trying to look to the sky. And yes the house is a fair bit more
noticeable, although I think the increased contrast is definatly
better. Thanks for your input contrary or otherwise :)
Russ
On 4/12/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well as constructive criticism.
2) Is big enough, or just right?
3) Is it bright enough?
Thanks for looking.
Russ
--
Legacy Air, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Russell Kerstetter
Subject: PESO - A Chilly Afternoon
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well as constructive
criticism.
Does nothing
Russell, I think you would be hard pressed to greatly change the
existing image impression. Maybe a bit of cropping of the top, cloning
out the structure peeking through the foliage on the right and giving
it more definition with a contrast/saturation bump and, maybe, a touch
of sharpening(???).
I
On Apr 11, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well as
constructive criticism.
Hmm. It's kinda flat, but has an interesting and
--- Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking
for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well
as constructive criticism.
Nice in its moody way.
2) Is big enough, or just
: PESO - A Chilly Afternoon
- Original Message -
From: Russell Kerstetter
Subject: PESO - A Chilly Afternoon
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as well as constructive
21 matches
Mail list logo
