Brian wrote:
> > It's possible that someone at Ricoh has decided that dual branding
> > might not be a good idea after all. 'Ricoh' doesn't appear on the
> > rear of the latest models (K-S1, Q-S1 and 645Z) - Just 'Pentax' on
> the front.
Bill wrote:
> Over on Pentax forums, there were people th
Thank you all for looking at...
Jack, more DOF was impossible under those shooting conditions
(open air, cloudy, at already high-ish ISO and "hand held").
Glad you liked it :)
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.word
On 12/22/2014 10:05 PM, Bill wrote:
On 22/12/2014 9:00 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 12/22/2014 9:50 PM, Bill wrote:
On 22/12/2014 2:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand
owned by
Ricoh.
It's muc
On 22/12/2014 9:00 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 12/22/2014 9:50 PM, Bill wrote:
On 22/12/2014 2:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand
owned by
Ricoh.
It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix
On 12/22/2014 9:50 PM, Bill wrote:
On 22/12/2014 2:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand
owned by
Ricoh.
It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix on its cameras.
OK, but I understood th
On 22/12/2014 2:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand owned by
Ricoh.
It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix on its cameras.
OK, but I understood that Pentax were keeping the brand name
On 12/22/2014 3:49 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand owned by
Ricoh.
It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix on its cameras.
OK, but I understood that Pentax were keeping the brand name
oh I see now - Bulent's
Makes it no less lovely of course!
I'm in a bit of a holiday fog
ann
On 12/22/2014 09:03, Zos Xavius wrote:
Not my picture Ann. :)
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
that's lovely, Zos -
Peso's don't HAVE to be Pentax, and since it is Ricoh almos
A fine photo - well composed and rendered.
Mark
On 12/21/2014 11:28 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
A monochrome.
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/droplets/
It is done with a Ricoh.
Not mean to be cheating, I just love this camera (GXR with 50mm macro module).
Bulent
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
Brian Walters wrote:
Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand owned by
Ricoh.
It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix on its cameras.
OK, but I understood that Pentax were keeping the brand name on the DSLRs.
Not having a K5 of any model,
Brian Walters wrote:
> Well, Pentax isn't a manufacturer any more - it's just a brand owned by
> Ricoh.
>
> It's much the same as Panasonic putting Lumix on its cameras.
OK, but I understood that Pentax were keeping the brand name on the DSLRs.
Not having a K5 of any model, I'm fairly sure even
Nice picture. Glad you like your gxr. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Not my picture Ann. :)
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> that's lovely, Zos -
>
> Peso's don't HAVE to be Pentax, and since it is Ricoh almost the same now
>
> ann
>
>
> On 12/21/2014 11:28, Bulent Celasun wrote:
>>
>> A monochrome.
>>
>> https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/1
Quoting Malcolm Smith :
With the K3, are they now exactly the same thing? I noted the pre-production
cameras were labelled Pentax front and rear, the production models had Ricoh
at the back. I assume therefore, you could happily enter a contest stating
either Pentax or Ricoh equipment only with
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> that's lovely, Zos -
>
> Peso's don't HAVE to be Pentax, and since it is Ricoh almost the same
> now
>
> ann
>
> On 12/21/2014 11:28, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> > A monochrome.
> >
> > https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/droplets/
> >
> > It is done with a Ricoh.
> >
>
that's lovely, Zos -
Peso's don't HAVE to be Pentax, and since it is Ricoh almost the same now
ann
On 12/21/2014 11:28, Bulent Celasun wrote:
A monochrome.
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/droplets/
It is done with a Ricoh.
Not mean to be cheating, I just love this camera (GXR with
Very nice!
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
> A monochrome.
>
> https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/droplets/
>
> It is done with a Ricoh.
>
> Not mean to be cheating, I just love this camera (GXR with 50mm macro module).
>
> Bulent
>
>
Good stuff, Bulent! Were it mine, however, I'd be admonishing myself for not
allowing the needed DOF to reach the upper left center droplets.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bulent Celasun"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014
A monochrome.
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/droplets/
It is done with a Ricoh.
Not mean to be cheating, I just love this camera (GXR with 50mm macro module).
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.
d J Brooks
Sent: June 4, 2012 6/4/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: PESO - Droplets
Frank does flowers.:-)
Dave
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
> around here:
>
> h
Frank does flowers.:-)
Dave
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
> around here:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/droplets.html
>
> BTW, if anyone knows what type of flower this is, I would lov
Mmmm tasty -T
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:42 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
> around here:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/droplets.html
>
> BTW, if anyone knows what type of flower this is, I would love to know.
>
>
Nice. The receding DOF gives it a sense of mystery.
Paul
On Jun 3, 2012, at 9:42 PM, frank theriault wrote:
> Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
> around here:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/droplets.html
>
> BTW, if anyone knows what type of f
Nice flower, nicely rendered.
I h
ave no idea what the flower is, however.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
> around here:
>
> http://knarfd
Took this a while ago, but it reflects the mostly moist weekend we had
around here:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/droplets.html
BTW, if anyone knows what type of flower this is, I would love to know.
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois con
Very well done. The best of your latest series !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Droplets
> Trillium plant showing the moisture from the grove. Taken in Muir
> Woods Redw
Bruce: I agree with Paul. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I like the light and the rendering, but the frame feels unbaanced to me.
> Paul
> -- Original message --
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Trillium p
I like the light and the rendering, but the frame feels unbaanced to me.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trillium plant showing the moisture from the grove. Taken in Muir
> Woods Redwood Grove.
>
> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4
Trillium plant showing the moisture from the grove. Taken in Muir
Woods Redwood Grove.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 300mm
ISO 800, 1/350 sec @ f/6.7, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5949.htm
--
Best regards,
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
29 matches
Mail list logo
