Cute as usual
Dave
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13335012size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13335012size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Delightful!
Jack
--- On Sun, 6/5/11, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO - You're it!
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, June 5, 2011, 12:58 PM
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13335012size=lg
On 6/5/11 21:58, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13335012size=lg
Nice.
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Paul,
Great colors and perfect timing.
Grace is a joy.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13335012size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 6/15/2006 10:01:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
Great shot, Bruce.
In a message dated 6/15/2006 2:41:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For those who took the time to look and comment, I have done some work
on the photo based on your input. Here it is:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112d.htm
Here is the original:
In a message dated 6/17/2006 8:06:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 6/15/2006 2:41:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For those who took the time to look and comment, I have done some work
on the photo based on your input. Here it is:
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:55 PM
Subject: PESO - You're mine!
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 15. juni 2006 18:55
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: PESO - You're mine!
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
Comments welcome
Very nice. I like the limited DOF. Just like the big guys from SI :-). I might
rotate it a few degrees counterclockwise to straighten the fence line. That
would necessitate cloning in a bit more dirt at bottom right, but I think it
would be worth the effort. You might also burn in some of the
Hi Bruce ...
First, it's a great capture - the look on the pitcher's face is great.
However, this one loses impact in the details. The slight tilt to the
fence can easily be corrected as Paul suggests, and I think it would help
the presentation. A little softer OOF area in the background would
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
KW Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:55 PM
KW Subject: PESO - You're mine!
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
Comments welcome
Hi again ... If you use this link
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/bdpitcher.html
you'll see the pic on the same background as yours - using the same
template that you use - and you may be better able to see the difference
between the two photos.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel
I am looking at this photo in Irfanview and I cannot see any tilt with
either the top or the bottom of the fence. The crop tools seems to
line up with the fence top perfectly. I agree with Shel that the
contrast could use a little work. Sharpness looks very good.
On 6/15/06, Shel Belinkoff
Hello Shel,
Thanks for the tips - I'll take a stab at this and see if I can
improve it along the lines you and others have suggested. I
appreciate your looking and ideas.
--
Bruce
Thursday, June 15, 2006, 11:08:16 AM, you wrote:
SB Hi Bruce ...
SB First, it's a great capture - the look on
Sorry, I was commenting on Shel's edit
On 6/15/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking at this photo in Irfanview and I cannot see any tilt with
either the top or the bottom of the fence. The crop tools seems to
line up with the fence top perfectly. I agree with Shel
Which pic are you looking at? One has the tilt corrected.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Perry Pellechia
First, it's a great capture - the look on the pitcher's face is great.
However, this one loses impact in the details. The slight tilt to the
fence can easily be corrected as
Hi Ken,
I don't see the background as all that confusing or distracting. Certainly
catching the kid's expression is more important than the fence, which can
be adjusted in numerous was within Photoshop or other editing software.
Add a little blur, perhaps a saturation or contrast adjustment,
would have sought a different vantage point or
gone for the least depth of field.
In the heat of the moment I probably wouldn't have noticed the background
until after the capture.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - You're mine
OK, I misunderstood you.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
I never said I'd walk away from that shot, but that if I noticed the
distracting background, I would have sought a different vantage point or
gone for the least depth of field.
In the heat of the moment I probably
For those who took the time to look and comment, I have done some work
on the photo based on your input. Here it is:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112d.htm
Here is the original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
--
Bruce
Thursday, June 15, 2006, 11:28:03 AM, you wrote:
On 6/15/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Little league pitching.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 260mm, monopod
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
Comments welcome
Love the eyes!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
On 6/15/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those who took the time to look and comment, I have done some work
on the photo based on your input. Here it is:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112d.htm
Here is the original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
I do
Much better, Bruce ... just a couple of things. The kid's face looks a
little too red or ruddy, and the yellow blob on the fence in the ULHC might
benefit from a reduction in saturation or something. Really minor, and
certainly almost more a matter of preference than anything else.
Shel
Here is the original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/giants_0112.htm
I do like the brightness and contrast changes, but (and I know
everyone will laugh at me) I rather prefer the tilted version.
He's
a bit more (how can I put it) askew. The tilted fence doesn't
bother
me a bit, and I
27 matches
Mail list logo
