I really like that a lot. I love the clasped hands in the foreground,
and the predominance of deep purple throughout the image in the
rendering. It's a very intriguing shot.
-- Walt
On 8/11/2012 7:16 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and
On Aug 11, 2012, at 7:15 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminds me of what Louis Armstrong (who didn't like bebop) said of bebop: If
you make a mistake, repeat it twice and call it improvisation. (paraphrased)
I have two rules for dancing lindy hop:
1) There are no mistakes, there is
On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I really like that a lot. I love the clasped hands in the foreground, and the
predominance of deep purple throughout the image in the rendering. It's a
very intriguing shot.
Thanks Walt. I think that the predominance of deep purple might
Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Yeah, it's a pretty neat shot.
Thanks. It's kind of cool what you can get when you screw up, and then
pretend that's what you meant to do.
Don't underestimate yourself. Having the artistic insight to recognize
YOU!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
Don't underestimate yourself. Having the artistic insight to recognize
potential and the skill to make something of it are far from
insignificant qualities.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I really like that a lot. I love the clasped hands in the foreground,
and the predominance of deep purple throughout the image in the rendering.
It's a very intriguing
That's a very well executed mistake.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in the low
light I completely blew the focus, absolutely nothing in the frame is even
remotely in focus. So I cranked
On Aug 12, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
That's a very well executed mistake.
Thanks. And Mark!
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in the low
light I completely blew the
On Aug 12, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I really like that a lot. I love the clasped hands in the foreground,
and the predominance of deep purple throughout the
Thanks Mark.
On Aug 12, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Yeah, it's a pretty neat shot.
Thanks. It's kind of cool what you can get when you screw up, and then
pretend that's what you meant to do.
Don't
I also like this one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7762486298/in/photostream/
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in the low
light I completely blew the focus, absolutely nothing in the
On Aug 12, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I also like this one:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7762486298/in/photostream/
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in the low
light I completely blew the focus, absolutely nothing in the frame is even
remotely in focus. So I cranked up clarity, contrast, vibrance etc. and came
up with this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7762232744/
That's a quite interesting effect
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I completely blew this shot. It was ISO 16,000, and in the low
light I completely blew the focus, absolutely
Yeah, it's a pretty neat shot.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a quite interesting effect
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Technically, I
On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Yeah, it's a pretty neat shot.
Thanks. It's kind of cool what you can get when you screw up, and then pretend
that's what you meant to do.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's a
Reminds me of what Louis Armstrong (who didn't like bebop) said of bebop: If
you make a mistake, repeat it twice and call it improvisation. (paraphrased)
Whether intended or not that's a really good photo!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
17 matches
Mail list logo