On Sep 22, 2005, at 5:04 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can
get are
small prints using the recommended ppi from the digi, well, that's an
unhappy circumstance. But it seems that many of you are getting
larger
than 6x9 prints from the
Thanks, gang ... I didn't even think about rezzing up. Certainly worth a
try to see what kind of quality can be had. It's also nice to know that,
with digi, a lower rez (200ppi v 330ppi) may give good results. I see a
batch of test prints in my future LOL
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
Whenever I have prints made on the Lightjet or the Frontier, I use 300ppi
to 330ppi or so for the resolution (is that the term?) which gives me a
nice, big, richly detailed print from scanned negatives. Using the same
resolution with the DS results in a much smaller print size, on the order
of
Shel - It seems to vary depending on the service provider and the
enlargement software they'll use on your files (something like Genuine
Fractals).
For example, PixelOutpost.com (specializing in large format prints)
indicates that a meager 3MP image is sufficient for creating a 22x28 inch
print;
On Sep 21, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Whenever I have prints made on the Lightjet or the Frontier, I use
300ppi
to 330ppi or so for the resolution (is that the term?) which gives
me a
nice, big, richly detailed print from scanned negatives. Using the
same
resolution with the
If you're only getting a 6x9 print at 300 dpi, you need to upsize the file when
you convert it. I convert all my RAW images to 360 dpi at 11 x 17 size, which
is the largest choice on the CS RAW converter. This produces a very nice inkjet
print. I haven't printed anything at a lab in quite a few
On 21/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can get are
small prints using the recommended ppi from the digi, well, that's an
unhappy circumstance. But it seems that many of you are getting larger
than 6x9 prints from the
, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:04 AM
Subject: PPI for Printing
Whenever I have prints made on the Lightjet or the Frontier, I use 300ppi
to 330ppi or so for the resolution
Try up-sizing them in Photoshop, the new Bicubic, Smoother seems to
work about as well as the expensive add ons do. For inkjet prints I
find anything over 200ppi works fine, below that I see a loss of
quality. I have not had any outsourced prints done so can not address
that issue.
graywolf
But do the upsize interpolation in the RAW conversion process. If you
have to do it later, use Bicubic Smoother.
Paul
On Sep 21, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 21/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can get
are
Subject: Re: PPI for Printing
In my experience, any output density over 360 ppi does not produce any
noticeable improvement, and between 200 and 360 ppi the improvements are
very fine *with digital capture images*. For larger scale prints, I've
gone as low as 150ppi with excellent results
11 matches
Mail list logo
