Anthony Farr wrote:
On 7 May 2010 18:54, Derby Chang wrote:
Anthony Farr wrote:
The new Pentax theme song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ69kSzms1w&feature=related
That certainly triggers some long-sleeping synapses. I was much more partial
to Monica, but Iggy still makes me
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Bob W wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> > "Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
>> > realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
>> > - Bill Robb
>>
>> Not if you're an Olympus OM-1, -2, -3 or -4 fan...
>>
>> Unsurpassed VF c
On 5/6/2010 9:56 PM, Michael Beacom wrote:
On May 6, 2010, at 1:09 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
CheekyGeek wrote:
"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
launching a mirror
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-05-06 22:37, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> If it was good enough for 2007, 2008, or 2009, if you recall
> correctly, then it's damn well good enough for 2010.
Ahhh. A fellow curmudgeon, I see. :-) Uphill both ways, was it?
Barefoot through waist deep snow!
--
PD
This statement is also a tribute to a fairly simple comment that rolls
around the net collecting lint until it can't be recognized for what
it was. Pentax is a small company and they see some advantage in
looking into niche markets rather than always taking Nikon and Canon
head on. Of course, I'v
On 7 May 2010 18:54, Derby Chang wrote:
> Anthony Farr wrote:
>>
>> The new Pentax theme song:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ69kSzms1w&feature=related
>>
>
> That certainly triggers some long-sleeping synapses. I was much more partial
> to Monica, but Iggy still makes me high-kick once in a
Mike Wilson wrote:
I thought this was about viewfinders, not price tags?
C'mon, any thread is about any topic!
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
th
Bob W wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > > "Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
> > > realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
> > > - Bill Robb
> >
> > Not if you're an Olympus OM-1, -2, -3 or -4 fan...
> >
> > Unsurpassed VF clarity or bri
Anthony Farr wrote:
The new Pentax theme song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ69kSzms1w&feature=related
That certainly triggers some long-sleeping synapses. I was much more
partial to Monica, but Iggy still makes me high-kick once in a while.
D
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.
The new Pentax theme song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJ69kSzms1w&feature=related
regards, Anthony
"Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
(Anon)
On 6 May 2010 22:27, CheekyGeek wrote:
> "Pentax engineers ar
On 07/05/2010, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> Digital talk was verboten on the LUG for years.
I left the LUG when most there were saying it couldn't be done and
would never happen (a digital M series body)
> And you were just talking about the cost of the bodies. Take a look at the
> Leica lens prices
On 2010-05-06 22:37, Matthew Hunt wrote:
If it was good enough for 2007, 2008, or 2009, if you recall
correctly, then it's damn well good enough for 2010.
Ahhh. A fellow curmudgeon, I see. :-) Uphill both ways, was it?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdm
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Doug Franklin
wrote:
> On 2010-05-06 21:56, Michael Beacom wrote:
>
>>> "Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
>>> realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
>>> - Bill Robb
>>
>> MARK!
>
> That was "Marked"
On 2010-05-06 21:56, Michael Beacom wrote:
"Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
- Bill Robb
MARK!
That was "Marked" in 2007, 2008, or 2009, if I recall correctly. That's
what Mark was ref
On May 6, 2010, at 1:09 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
CheekyGeek wrote:
"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the fir
[...]
> >
> > On the other hand, I haven't actually LOOKED thru a Leica S2 VF.
> > Perhaps some day I might.
>
> A friend of mine had one from the Leica rep to work with for
> a week, so I got a chance to play with it for a few minutes.
> A lovely camera in every way. It's about the distance fr
Digital talk was verboten on the LUG for years. Then the M8 arrived, and film
camera talk has all but vanished. With the introduction of the M9, the M8 folks
are the wannabes.
And you were just talking about the cost of the bodies. Take a look at the
Leica lens prices these days. The cost of t
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
>> Try the Leica S2 - then you'll know what unsurpassed means!
>
> Yeah, well, you may be right. I'll never know.
> I was so ignorant of it, I had to Google it! Imagine!
>
> Anyhow, when I saw the price, I froze up and couldn’t move for several
>
Bob W wrote:
[...]
"Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
- Bill Robb
Not if you're an Olympus OM-1, -2, -3 or -4 fan...
Unsurpassed VF clarity or brilliance. :-)
Try the Leica S2 - then yo
[...]
>
> > "Pentax viewfinders are pretty good compared to the competition. I
> > realize that's like saying my dog has pretty good breath for a dog."
> > - Bill Robb
>
> Not if you're an Olympus OM-1, -2, -3 or -4 fan...
>
> Unsurpassed VF clarity or brilliance. :-)
>
Try the Leica S2 - th
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
CheekyGeek wrote:
"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
to an 'exciting' few
"We don't want to be seen as the same as everyone else"
That's a vague statement. Please be more specific.
"We don't want to be seen"
Succeeded! What next?
"We don't"
I see...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
Pentax makes a number of small lenses. It would be nice to have a
small camera like the NX-whatever or the E-P1 that could use them.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:27 AM, CheekyGeek wrote:
> "Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
> launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens cam
John Francis wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
CheekyGeek wrote:
"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
to an 'exciting' few months ahead. "
Full articl
John Francis wrote:
>On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
>> CheekyGeek wrote:
>>
>> >"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
>> >launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
>> >to an 'exciting' few months ahead.
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:46:50AM -0400, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
> CheekyGeek wrote:
>
> >"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
> >launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
> >to an 'exciting' few months ahead. "
> >
> >Full article:
> >h
CheekyGeek wrote:
>"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
>launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
>to an 'exciting' few months ahead. "
>
>Full article:
>http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_wont_rule_out_mirrorless_camera_news_2
"Pentax engineers are continuing to pursue the possibility of
launching a mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera, as the firm points
to an 'exciting' few months ahead. "
Full article:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_wont_rule_out_mirrorless_camera_news_297728.html
Darren Addy
Ke
28 matches
Mail list logo
