Kevin wrote:
Kodak 22 megapixel is what Hasselblad have been using and doing very well
with.
Now they have upped the ante a little with the release of the H2 system
and a 39 megapixel Kodak sensor.
These chips are not cheap as we all know, neither are pro level camera
bodies.
Other MF
Pål Jensen wrote:
Kevin wrote:
Kodak 22 megapixel is what Hasselblad have been using and doing very
well with.
Now they have upped the ante a little with the release of the H2 system
and a 39 megapixel Kodak sensor.
These chips are not cheap as we all know, neither are pro level
camera
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless the Pentax comes in at high-end 35mm-based DSLR prices, it's going
to have issues because of the lack of interchangable backs.
Not at all. The only reason for digital backs to exist is that the price of
the thing is so
Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message - From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless the Pentax comes in at high-end 35mm-based DSLR prices, it's
going to have issues because of the lack of interchangable backs.
Not at all. The only reason for digital backs to exist is that the
price
Since the article in the BJP a few weeks ago quoting 22 megapixels for
the Pentax 645D there's been a lot of speculation about what sensor
the camera is really going to use.
I've just had an email exchange from my friend who works at Kodak in
the sensor division. He's one of my former marathon
Hmmm.. Will be interesting to watch.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the article in the BJP a few weeks ago quoting 22 megapixels
for
the Pentax 645D there's been a lot of speculation about what sensor
the camera is really going to use.
I've just had an email
This one time, at band camp, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, the 18 megapixel sensor is out. Smart money would be on the
Kodak 22 megapixel (4080 x 5440) sensor, though that obviously isn't
confirmed at this point.
Kodak 22 megapixel is what Hasselblad have been using and doing
7 matches
Mail list logo
