John Francis wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:03:29PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> John Francis wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:23:22PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>>>
To do perspective correction in photoshop or any other imaging software,
you
must loos
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis"
Subject: Re: Pentax K28mm 3.5 shift
>>
>> With a perspective shift lens you're using a larger-image-circle lens
>> and those generally (though not always) have lower resolution than
>> standard 35mm le
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:03:29PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> John Francis wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:23:22PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
> >> To do perspective correction in photoshop or any other imaging software,
> >> you
> >> must loose pixels, synthisize pixels or both. Shift is s
John Francis wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:23:22PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>> To do perspective correction in photoshop or any other imaging software, you
>> must loose pixels, synthisize pixels or both. Shift is still the way for
>> digital purists.
>
> That's possibly true (but watch o
On May 18, 2008, at 7:47 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>> digital purists.
>> Surely an oxymoron?
> It's a bit off.
Just words.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and foll
Cotty wrote:
> On 17/5/08, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> digital purists.
>>
>
> Surely an oxymoron?
>
It's a bit off.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the l
2008/5/18 Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 17/5/08, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>digital purists.
>
> Surely an oxymoron?
No chemical contaminants
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
On 17/5/08, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>digital purists.
Surely an oxymoron?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:23:22PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
> To do perspective correction in photoshop or any other imaging software, you
> must loose pixels, synthisize pixels or both. Shift is still the way for
> digital purists.
That's possibly true (but watch out for those loose pixels :-)
of this message,
> but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Pentax K2
this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax K28mm 3.5 shift
>I know that
Then I'd have to buy Pentacon lenses. Hell, when I was looking at the
Pentax 28mm shift it was selling for around $1000 used if the dealer
knew what they had, and I didn't run into any who didn't. The real
utility comes into play on shorter FL lenses, (most manufactures of
these types of lens
>DagT wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 14:25:50 -0700
>
>> I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it sounds fun and I had a weak
>> moment)
>>
>> Does anybody know anything about it?
>
>I bought a used copy a couple years ago on EvilBay for about $450 and
>thought I got a decent deal, but yours certain
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:38 AM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off you got the bargain of the century, I was looking into a shift
> lens some time ago and decided I couldn't afford the Pentax it was just
> too expensive. I hate you.
If you want a cheap shift lens, does this do y
> Does anybody know anything about it?
Yeah - its doesn't have a tilt mechanism.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "DagT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pentax K28mm 3.5 shift
>I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 17:01:32 -0700
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jim King wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 16:39:12 -0700
> > >
> > > > (snip)
> > > > I've enjoy
- Original Message -
From: "Jim King"
Subject: Re: Pentax K28mm 3.5 shift- correction
> Yes - I was using the Green Button for manual exposure metering after
> I adjusted the amount of shift. The resulting images were underexposed
>
Ok, post this on pentax
Adam Maas wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 17:01:32 -0700
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jim King wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 16:39:12 -0700
> >
> > > (snip)
> > > I've enjoyed using it on my Pentax DSLRs but found that it
> tends to
> > > progressively unde
Adam Maas wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 17:01:32 -0700
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jim King wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 16:39:12 -0700
> >
> > > (snip)
> > > I've enjoyed using it on my Pentax DSLRs but found that it
> tends to
> > > progressively unde
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Jim King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim King wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 16:39:12 -0700
>
> > (snip)
> > I've enjoyed using it on my Pentax DSLRs but found that it tends to
> > progressively underexpose when using TTL metering as I move to smaller
> > apertures
Jim King wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 16:39:12 -0700
> (snip)
> I've enjoyed using it on my Pentax DSLRs but found that it tends to
> progressively underexpose when using TTL metering as I move to smaller
> apertures. That's not usually a problem because this lens requires a
> deliberative style of
DagT wrote on Wed, 14 May 2008 14:25:50 -0700
> I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it sounds fun and I had a weak
> moment)
>
> Does anybody know anything about it?
I bought a used copy a couple years ago on EvilBay for about $450 and
thought I got a decent deal, but yours certainly beats t
I know that in the days before digital it sold for three times that
or more. But now with PhotoShop perspective controls, it's somewhat
redundant. But it should be fun. Good buy:-).
Paul
On May 14, 2008, at 5:24 PM, DagT wrote:
> I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it sounds fun and I had a
Its also really handy for doing panoramas.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_09/07_09_blackwattle/01.htm
You certainly got a bargain.
D
Bob Sullivan wrote:
> You got a good deal. $450-$500 would be a fair price.
> It's been one of the few perspective correction lenses out there.
> Bef
You got a good deal. $450-$500 would be a fair price.
It's been one of the few perspective correction lenses out there.
Before photoshop, it was THE LENS for architectural exteriors.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suddenly bought one for about
First off you got the bargain of the century, I was looking into a shift
lens some time ago and decided I couldn't afford the Pentax it was just
too expensive. I hate you.
DagT wrote:
> I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it sounds fun and I had a weak
> moment)
>
> Does anybody know anyth
I suddenly bought one for about $200. (it sounds fun and I had a weak
moment)
Does anybody know anything about it?
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
27 matches
Mail list logo
