On 9/11/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>- Put a nice, trim eye-level viewfinder IN the camera and clean
>ergonomics and shape. The Fuji X100's body and controls are a model of
>simple, attractive, easy to figure out, easy to remember design.
If this had a Pentax name on it, I
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
>>
>> My reply:
>>
>> Ditto, and add a 28mm pancake and a couple zooms!
>
> How about being able to actually capture a moving object as seen you see it
> in the viewfinder?
> The EVFs that I've used are just about useless on non static subjects.
2010/11/9 Jaume Lahuerta :
>
> http://k-rumors.com/k4-pentax-mirrorless-camera-to-be-announced-in-february-2011/
too bad they wasted the 110 designation on that meaningless i110 job... =(
ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBS
I like it. just a little sight on the top like a rifle.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:06 AM, eckinator wrote:
> 2010/11/9 Steven Desjardins :
>>
>> The GF1/E-P1 design is the best route IMHO. Pentax already makes
>> small DSLRs. They need something that has the appeal of a range
>> finder. I'm hop
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Bonazza"
Subject: Re: Pentax mirrorless in Spring !
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If Pentax is going to get involved with an all electronic viewfinder,
interchangeable lens camera
Yep John, exactly and this means (being realistic) that screwdrive
probably won't be supported and maybe even not aperture lever. It
would be very nice but don't count on it.
2010/11/9, John Francis :
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:37:53PM +0100, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>
On 9 November 2010 04:57, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> http://k-rumors.com/k4-pentax-mirrorless-camera-to-be-announced-in-february-2011/
>
>
> Hold on, Miserere !!!
> ;-)
For whatever it's worth, Thom Hogan is predicting a mirrorless Pentax for 2011:
http://bythom.com/2011predictions.htm
He phrased
On 9 November 2010 14:59, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Maybe just a DS with the mirror left out.
I hope not! There would be little benefit there.
This might be a viable option for K-x/K-r type bodies in the future
(actually, it's what I think WILL happen), but it doesn't take full
advantage of kil
Maybe just a DS with the mirror left out.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>>- Put a nice, trim eye-level viewfinder IN the camera
>
> Not going to happen. I'd love it, too. But it ain't going to happen.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDM
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>- Put a nice, trim eye-level viewfinder IN the camera
Not going to happen. I'd love it, too. But it ain't going to happen.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On 9 November 2010 14:03, John Francis wrote:
>
> Note that with DA lenses this would require a mechanical coupling
> to stop down the lens - there's no aperture ring on the lens itself.
> This capability would probably have to be provided by the adapter;
> I'd expect any totally new lens range to
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 07:37:53PM +0100, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> If Pentax is going to get involved with an all electronic viewfinder,
> interchangeable lens camera, I'd love to see them:
>
> - Design it as a NEW line with a short lens mount register to allow
> adaptabil
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If Pentax is going to get involved with an all electronic viewfinder,
interchangeable lens camera, I'd love to see them:
- Design it as a NEW line with a short lens mount register to allow
adaptability to many lenses, like with Micro-FourThirds.
- Deliver it with a trio
On 9 November 2010 12:49, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> If Pentax is going to get involved with an all electronic viewfinder,
> interchangeable lens camera, I'd love to see them:
>
> - Design it as a NEW line with a short lens mount register to allow
> adaptability to many lenses, like wi
On Nov 9, 2010, at 11:49, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> - Put a nice, trim eye-level viewfinder IN the camera and clean
> ergonomics and shape. The Fuji X100's body and controls are a model of
> simple, attractive, easy to figure out, easy to remember design.
>
Oh god, I'd just managed to put that
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> The GF1/E-P1 design is the best route IMHO. Pentax already makes
> small DSLRs. They need something that has the appeal of a range
> finder. I'm hopeful on this one.
I have a GF1 on my desk right now. Since I bought the E-5, I've been
On 9 November 2010 04:57, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> http://k-rumors.com/k4-pentax-mirrorless-camera-to-be-announced-in-february-2011/
>
>
> Hold on, Miserere !!!
> ;-)
Ha ha ha, I have nothing to hold on to!
--
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Q
2010/11/9 Steven Desjardins :
>
> The GF1/E-P1 design is the best route IMHO. Pentax already makes
> small DSLRs. They need something that has the appeal of a range
> finder. I'm hopeful on this one.
my bets are on an ANVIL design - Absolutely No Viewfinder &
Interchangeable Lens and it will be
The GF1/E-P1 design is the best route IMHO. Pentax already makes
small DSLRs. They need something that has the appeal of a range
finder. I'm hopeful on this one.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> http://k-rumors.com/k4-pentax-mirrorless-camera-to-be-announced-in-february-
http://k-rumors.com/k4-pentax-mirrorless-camera-to-be-announced-in-february-2011/
Hold on, Miserere !!!
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
20 matches
Mail list logo
